不同保护和利用措施对高寒草甸植被-土壤碳密度的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

青海省科技计划项目(2022-ZJ-702);中国农业科学院草原研究所科技创新工程所级统筹协同项目(CAAS-ASTIP-2024-IGR-XT02)


The effects of different conservation and utilization measures on the vegetation-soil carbon density in alpine meadow
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

青海省科技计划项目(2022-ZJ-702);中国农业科学院草原研究所科技创新工程所级统筹协同项目(CAAS-ASTIP-2024-IGR-XT02)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    草地作为陆地生态系统主体,直接参与全球碳循环,对草地碳储量的研究一直是生态学前沿的热点和难点。高寒草甸是"地球第三极"青藏高原的主要植被类型,具有重要的固碳和水源涵养功能。目前,关于不同保护和利用措施对高寒草甸碳储量的影响尚不明确。研究不同保护和利用措施下高寒草甸植被-土壤碳密度,对科学评估高寒草甸碳储量及生态保护具有重要的理论和现实意义。以高寒草甸为研究对象,采集6种不同保护和利用措施(全年放牧、夏季放牧、冬季放牧、围栏封育、补播、人工草地)下的样地地上生物量、枯落物和不同深度(0-10cm,10-20cm,20-30cm)的根系和土壤,通过比较分析植被碳密度、土壤碳碳密度、根冠碳密度比以及植被土壤碳密度分配特征,旨在为高寒草甸草地生态系统科学管理提供理论依据,同时为不同保护和利用措施下高寒草甸碳密度估算提供数据支撑。结果表明:(1)不同保护和利用措施下高寒草甸植被-土壤系统碳密度存在显著差异,碳密度含量为人工草地 > 围栏封育 > 补播,冬季放牧 > 夏季放牧 > 全年放牧;(2)在三种不同保护措施中,补播草地植被碳密度(619.08g/m2)显著高于人工草地和围栏封育草地碳密度(P<0.05),人工草地土壤碳密度(19409.25g/m2)、植被-土壤系统碳密度(19654.90g/m2)、土壤碳密度/植被-土壤系统碳密度(99%)均显著高于补播和围栏封育草地(P<0.05),而根冠碳密度比(2.71 ∶ 1)低于其他保护措施;(3)在三种不同利用措施中,冬季放牧高寒草甸植被碳密度(1305.63g/m2)、土壤碳密度(14369.58g/m2)、植被-土壤碳密度(15740.66g/m2)和根冠碳密度比(27.14 ∶ 1)均显著高于夏季放牧和全年放牧草地,相反,土壤碳密度/植被-土壤系统碳密度(91%)低于其他两种放牧利用草地。综上所述,人工草地和冬季放牧是提升高寒草甸碳汇潜力的优化管理措施。研究结果强调了有针对性的保护和利用措施对加强高寒草甸碳固存的重要性,并为实现高寒草甸碳汇潜力的最大化提供数据支撑。

    Abstract:

    Grasslands,as the central components of terrestrial ecosystems,is directly participate in the global carbon cycle. The study of grassland carbon storage has always been a hot and difficult point in the forefront of ecological science. Alpine meadows,which cover much of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau,the 'Third Pole of the Earth’,are vital for carbon sequestration and water conservation. The effects of various conservation and utilization strategies on the carbon storage in alpine meadows are not yet fully comprehended. Examining the vegetation-soil carbon density across various conservation and utilization practices in alpine meadows is crucial for precisely evaluating carbon reserves and ecological conservation efforts. This study examined the impacts of six distinct management practices on alpine meadows: year-round grazing,summer grazing,winter grazing,grazing exclusion,reseeding grassland,and artificial grassland establishment. To assess these impacts,aboveground biomass,litter,and soil samples were systematically collected from three soil depths (0-10 cm,10-20 cm,and 20-30 cm). To improve the accuracy of carbon density estimation under various conservation and utilization practices,this research compares vegetation and soil carbon densities,their root-to-shoot ratio,and their spatial distribution. The goal is to provide a solid theoretical foundation for the scientific management of alpine meadow ecosystems. The results showed that: (1) carbon density demonstrated significant differences within the vegetation-soil system of alpine meadows in under various protection and utilization regimes,with artificial grasslands>enclosure>reseeding,and winter grazing>summer grazing>year-round grazing in terms of carbon density content; (2) among the three conservation measures,reseeded grasslands exhibited a notably higher vegetation carbon density (619.08g/m2) compared to artificial and enclosed grasslands (P<0.05). Artificial grasslands boasted significantly higher soil carbon density (19409.25g/m2),vegetation-soil system carbon density (19654.90g/m2),and a soil carbon density/vegetation-soil system carbon density ratio of 99%,in contrast to reseeding and enclosed grasslands (P<0.05),while the root-to-shoot carbon density ratio (2.71 ∶ 1) was lower than other measures; (3) among the three utilization measures,winter-grazed alpine meadows had significantly higher vegetation carbon density (1305.63g/m2),soil carbon density (14369.58g/m2),vegetation-soil carbon density (15740.66g/m2),and root-to-shoot carbon density ratio (27.14 ∶ 1) compared to summer-grazed and year-round grazed grasslands,with a lower soil carbon density/vegetation-soil system carbon density ratio of 91%. In conclusion,the implementation of artificial grassland and winter grazing practices represents an optimal management approach for augmenting the carbon sink potential of alpine meadow ecosystems. These findings underscore the importance of tailored conservation strategies for enhancing carbon sequestration and provide data support for maximizing the carbon sequestration potential of alpine meadow ecosystems under various conservation and utilization practices.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李瑞玲,王海,哈斯巴根,才文旦周,王佳豪,石红霄.不同保护和利用措施对高寒草甸植被-土壤碳密度的影响.生态学报,2025,45(6):2595~2604

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: