整合生态系统服务与驱动因素阈值效应的生态安全分区研究——以西南地区为例
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(42001090);重庆市社会科学规划项目(2020BS45);重庆市教委科学技术研究项目(KJQN202000512)


Integrating the threshold effects of driving forces on ecosystem service into the ecological security zoning: a case study in the southwest China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    生态系统服务供给能力和权衡/协同关系已被广泛用于生态保护和生态安全分区研究中。但现有分区研究多侧重于生态系统服务供给能力或权衡/协同关系的某一方面,且在分区过程中较少考虑生态系统服务对驱动因素的非线性响应。基于此,以西南地区为例,在对区域土壤保持、产水、净初级生产力(NPP)及粮食供应四类服务供给量和权衡/协同关系进行估算的基础上,构建生态系统服务供给指数、关系指数和综合指数。在对三类指数时空变化特征进行剖析的同时,重点探讨主要驱动因素与生态系统服务综合指数间的约束关系,识别临界阈值,进而明确区域生态安全分区及优化方案。结果显示:(1)2000-2020年,区域生态系统服务供给指数呈上升趋势,体现了生态修复的积极作用;同时,在追求生态系统服务供给能力最大化输出的过程中,造成了区域生态系统服务权衡关系的增强。因此,有必要将生态系统服务供给和权衡/协同关系同时纳入生态安全分区中。(2)空间上,三类指数的低值区高度重合,均位于川西高原;但高值区的分布存在一定差异,供给指数的高值区位于研究区西南角,而关系指数和综合指数的高值区位于研究区东部。(3)自然-社会条件、植被环境条件和社会-经济条件是影响区域生态系统服务综合指数变化的主要因素,三者与综合指数间呈倒"U"型约束关系,即存在明显的阈值效应。且随时间推移,自然-社会条件和植被环境条件对生态系统服务综合指数的约束效应略有收紧。(4)研究区以相对修复区为主,其次是重点修复区和相对安全区,生态安全区面积最小。未来可以对不同分区上的限制因素进行调整以实现区域生态系统服务供给最大和关系最优。

    Abstract:

    The supply capacity and trade-off/synergy relationship of ecosystem services have been widely used in the study of ecological protection and ecological security zoning. However, existing studies may primarily focus on one aspect of the supply capacity or the trade-off/synergy relationship of ecosystem services, ignoring the nonlinear response of ecosystem service to driving forces during the zoning process. Here, taking southwest China as an example, we estimated the supply capacity and trade-off/synergy relationship of soil conservation, water production, net primary productivity and food supply, and constructed a supply index, a relationship index and a comprehensive index for ecosystem services. Further, we analyzed the spatiotemporal characteristics of the three indexes, explored the constraint relationship between the main driving forces and the comprehensive index, identified the critical thresholds, and clarified the regional ecological safety zoning and optimization plans. It was found that: (1) From 2000 to 2020, the supply index for ecosystem services slightly increased, reflecting the positive effect of ecological restoration; while there was obvious trade-off relationship of local regions in the maximizing pursuit of ecosystem service supply. It is necessary to incorporate both ecosystem service supply and trade-off/synergy relationship into the ecological safety zoning. (2) Spatially, the regions with low-value of the three indexes were highly overlapped and located in the western Sichuan Plateau, while the distribution of the regions with high value differed. The regions with high supply index were distributed in the southwest corner of the study area, and the regions with high relationship index and comprehensive index were concentrated in the east part. (3) Nature-society condition, vegetation-environment condition, and social-economy condition were main forces affecting the change of comprehensive index. There was an inverted U-shaped relationship between the driving forces and comprehensive index, indicating a clear threshold effect. The constraints of nature-society condition and vegetation-environment condition on the comprehensive index tightened over time. (4) The study area was dominated by the relative restoration area, followed by the relative safety area and key restoration area, and the absolute safety zone was with the smallest area. In the future, adjustments can be made to the constraint forces in different zoning to achieve the maximum supply and optimal relationship of regional ecosystem services.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

温婉琴,王强,陈田田.整合生态系统服务与驱动因素阈值效应的生态安全分区研究——以西南地区为例.生态学报,2024,44(8):3142~3156

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: