基于GlobeLand30的城市生态用地时空变化特征——以北京市为例
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

科技基础资源调查专项(2019FY202502)


Spatial and temporal change characteristics of ecological land in Beijing based on GlobeLand30
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    生态用地是保障城市生态系统结构及功能稳定的土地类型。在城市高速增长而土地资源有限的背景下,北京市探索了城市总体规划统领的生态保护与建设有效途径,探究其生态用地时空变化特征,能够为生态用地与建设用地同步规划和协调布局提供参考。针对现有研究中孤立探讨生态用地相关问题的不足,将城市视为一个整体,在综合分析生态用地与其他用地的关系的视角下,基于北京市2000年、2010年和2020年的GlobeLand30土地覆盖数据,首先分析了2000-2020年生态用地与建设用地、农用地的相互转化,揭示了各类用地变化强度在不同距离及方位的空间分布特征,应用景观格局指数刻画了空间形态变化;其次,进一步拓展了景观扩张指数的应用范围,建立景观扩张/收缩指数判定生态用地空间形态变化模式;通过高斯两步移动搜索法计算建设用地与生态用地的可达性。结果表明:(1)生态用地面积占比一直为13%-15%,但不同距离和方位的空间分布发生显著变化,生态条件较好区域受城市增长负面影响较大,生态条件相对薄弱区域的生态建设在城市增长中加强。(2)生态用地的空间形态变化不大,但空间分布趋于分散;生态用地增加以新生模式和扩展模式为主,减少则从消亡模式为主转向分裂模式和收缩模式为主。(3)建设用地与生态用地的可达性整体偏低,2000-2010年新增建设用地可达性的低等级占比高于既有建设用地,可达性高值区零散分布在中心区域;2010-2020年新增建设用地可达性的较高等级占比高于既有建设用地,可达性较高区域的空间分布更加均匀。研究结果有助于从北京市解决城市增长与生态建设矛盾的成效中,发现值得其它城市借鉴的有益经验。

    Abstract:

    Ecological land guarantees the stability of urban ecosystem structure and function. In the background of rapid urban development and the constraints of available land resources, Beijing has explored many effective ways to coordinate ecological protection and urban development under the framework of the city master plan. To provide a reference for the synchronized planning and coordinated layout of ecological land and construction land, it is necessary to analyze the spatial and temporal characteristics of ecological land change. In response to the inadequacy of the existing studies on ecological land, this paper considered the city as a whole, not only focusing on ecological land itself, but in the framework of a comprehensive analysis of the interconversion of ecological and other types of land. Based on the GlobeLand30 land cover data of Beijing in 2000, 2010 and 2020, this paper analyzed the interconversion of ecological land, construction land and agricultural land from 2000 to 2020, revealing the spatial distribution characteristics of land change intensity of various land use types at different distances and orientations. Moreover, we further depicted the spatial and morphological pattern of ecological land changes using Landscape Pattern Index. We modified the landscape expansion index (LEI) to landscape expansion/shrink index (LESI) to reveal the spatial change pattern of ecological land both the increasing part (e.g., outlying and edge-expansion growth) and the decreasing part (e.g., extinction, fragmentation and shrink pattern). In addition, the accessibility of construction land and ecological land was calculated by Gaussian based on 2-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method. The results showed that:(1) the proportion of ecological land area has been maintained at 13%-15% from 2000 to 2020. Despite the rapid expansion of construction land, ecological land has not grown in tandem. However, the spatial distribution of ecological land at different distances and orientations has changed significantly. The areas with better ecological conditions were negatively affected by urban growth, while areas with worse ecological conditions were strengthened in the ecological construction of urban growth. (2) The spatial distribution of ecological land tended to be disperse. The increasing parts were identified as the outlying and edge-expansion growth patterns, while the decreasing parts changed from the extinction pattern to the fragmentation and shrink patterns. (3) The accessibility of construction land and ecological land was generally low during the study period. From 2000 to 2010, there were more new construction lands with low grade of accessibility than existing construction land, while the areas with high grade of accessibility were scattered in the central areas of the city; from 2010 to 2020, there were more new construction lands with high grade of accessibility than existing construction land, and the spatial distribution of higher accessibility areas was more uniform. Focusing on the spatial and temporal changes of ecological land from 2000 to 2020, this paper revealed the mutual interconversion intensity and spatial morphological changes of ecological land, construction land and agricultural land under the background of rapid urban growth, providing practical reference in solving the contradiction between urban growth and ecological construction.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

裴子萱,李强,刘婷婷,魏婵娟,高雨萌.基于GlobeLand30的城市生态用地时空变化特征——以北京市为例.生态学报,2022,42(24):10072~10087

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: