居民视角下社会生态系统服务权衡关系研究——以四川泸沽湖旅游风景区为例
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


A study of the trade-off relationship between social values for ecosystem services from the perspective of residents:Taking Lugu Lake Tourism Scenic Area in Sichuan as an Example
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University;2.School of Geography and Tourism,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi'3.'4.an 710119;5.China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    利益相关者对社会生态系统服务的感知偏好直接关系到人类福祉。本研究以四川省泸沽湖旅游风景区为案例地,通过半结构访谈与参与式制图数据收集方法,结合质性分析与空间分析,对社区居民视角下社会生态系统服务的属性、权衡-协同关系及其空间分布与形成机制进行了探究。研究发现:(1)社区居民感知到有6类社会生态系统服务,按占比依次为代表性、生活保障、精神性、休闲娱乐、经济、美学服务,其中文化属性服务占比最高,凸显了地方文化认同的核心地位;(2)社会生态系统服务间关系以协同为主,分布于多功能复合区,经济服务作为关键驱动力与代表性、美学等服务相互促进,而权衡关系集中于单一功能区,表现为经济服务对文化空间与社区功能的挤压;(3)旅游开发通过重塑需求、重构供给与重建空间功能,触发“需求-供给-空间”三元动态交互,共同塑造了权衡-协同关系的时空分异与演变路径。本研究通过剖析旅游开发驱动的社会生态系统服务权衡-协同形成机制与动态演变过程,能够为民族地区生态-文化-经济协同发展与社会生态系统服务管理提供理论与实践参考。

    Abstract:

    Social values for ecosystem services represent the material and non-material benefits that humans derive from ecosystems, and are integral components of socio-ecological systems, reflecting how people perceive, interact with and give meaning to their environment. Stakeholders' perception preferences of these values are critical for sustainable ecosystem management and fundamentally linked to human well-being. Taking the Lugu Lake Tourist Scenic Area in Sichuan Province as a case study, this research investigated the attributes, trade-offs, spatial distribution patterns, and formation mechanisms of social values for ecosystem services from community residents' perspectives. By integrating semi-structured interviews, participatory mapping, and a mixed-method approach combining qualitative and spatial analyses, this research provided an understanding of how tourism development reshapes the dynamics of social values for ecosystem services. Key findings were as follows: First, community residents perceived six categories of social values for ecosystem services, ordered by their proportional emphasis as follows: representative services (24.55%), livelihood support (18.13%), spiritual services (16.42%), recreational services (14.70%), economic services (14.28%), and aesthetic services (11.92%). Notably, cultural attributes were identified as the most prominent across these categories, with representative and spiritual services collectively accounting for 40.97% of total responses, underscoring the centrality of local cultural identity in shaping residents’ perceptions. Secondly, synergistic relationships (87.19%) predominantly characterized interactions among social values for ecosystem services, with these synergies concentrated in multifunctional zones where economic services acted as a key driver, mutually reinforcing services such as representation and aesthetics. For instance, cultural landmarks and scenic areas attracted tourists, fostering mutual benefits between cultural preservation and economic growth. In contrast, trade-offs (12.81%) were concentrated in single-function zones, primarily driven by economic services displacing cultural spaces and community functions. For instance, commercialization of sacred sites and overcrowding in residential areas highlighted tensions between tourism revenue and community well-being. Third, tourism development reshaped residents’ priorities (demand), altered resource allocation (supply), and redefined spatial functions (space). These three components formed a dynamic “demand-supply-space” triad, collectively shaping the spatiotemporal differentiation and evolution of trade-offs and synergistic relationships of social values for ecosystem services. The findings emphasized the dual role of economic services as both a driver of synergies and a source of conflict. This study dissected the formation mechanisms and dynamic evolution of tourism-driven trade-offs and synergies in social values for ecosystem services. The proposed triad framework integrated stakeholder perceptions with spatiotemporal dynamics, offering theoretical foundations and practical references for coordinating ecological, cultural, and economic development while enhancing ecosystem service management in ethnic regions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

黄凯森,赵振斌,张家玮,李洋洋,冯晓.居民视角下社会生态系统服务权衡关系研究——以四川泸沽湖旅游风景区为例.生态学报,,(). http://dx. doi. org/[doi]

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: