文化与自然生态系统服务的空间模式融入区域空间治理的研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.中央民族大学民族学与社会学学院;2.中央民族大学国家安全研究院;3.中央民族大学生命与环境科学学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划课题(2022YFF1303001)


Integrating spatial patterns of cultural and natural ecosystem services into regional spatial governance
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Ethnology and Sociology, Minzu University of China;2.Institute of National Security Studies, Minzu University of China;3.College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China

Fund Project:

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF1303001)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    快速城镇化背景下,自然生态系统服务与生态系统文化服务的空间关系研究已经成为区域可持续发展的热点问题,二者的权衡与协同机制亟待解析,以江西省为例,利用多源数据,综合分析了自然生态系统与生态系统文化服务的空间关联模式以及驱动机制,探究了其在区域空间治理中的应用路径。具体而言,基于SolVES模型构建文化服务空间分布格局,通过结构方程模型刻画居民感知与文化服务之间的作用路径,借助Transformer - GeoShapley模型识别自然生态系统服务与文化生态系统服务之间的关联模式,完善了现有研究在解析二者耦合机制方面的不足。在此基础上,构建“生态供给–社会赋能–协同治理”的研究框架,将识别出的非线性服务互动关系嵌入国土空间规划情景中,以实现从定量评估到治理实践的衔接。研究发现,江西省文化服务空间分布呈 “中部中高、四周偏低” 格局,娱乐休闲、美学景观等服务高值区集中于南昌、九江等自然–人文禀赋叠加区,而自然服务则表现为 “边缘高、中心低” 的自然本底依赖性;居民对文化服务的感知以自然环境与文化历史认知为双核心,世居民族对文化遗产的认同度更高;自然服务与文化服务的协同关系主要分布于生态–文化复合区(北部鄱阳湖周边),权衡关系集中于南部农业主导区,且这种空间分异可通过分区管控、景观优化等措施实现动态平衡,不仅为解析江西省“自然–文化”系统耦合规律提供了新范式,其提出的协同治理路径也为全球类似区域的生态保护与文化传承协同发展提供了可借鉴的中国方案。

    Abstract:

    Against the backdrop of rapid urbanization, the spatial relationship between natural ecosystem services (NES) and cultural ecosystem services (CES) has become a focal issue for regional sustainable development, while the mechanisms underlying their trade-offs and synergies require urgent clarification. Using Jiangxi Province as a case study, this research integrated multi-source data to analyze the spatial association patterns and driving mechanisms of NES and CES, and explored how these relationships could inform pathways for regional spatial governance. Specifically, the spatial distribution pattern of CES was mapped using the SolVES model. Structural equation modeling was then used to characterize the pathways through which residents’ perceptions influenced CES. Additionally, the Transformer-GeoShapley model was applied to identify and quantify the association patterns between NES and CES, thereby addressing the limitations of previous studies in interpreting their coupling mechanisms. Building on this, a research framework of “ecological supply-social empowerment-collaborative governance” was developed. By explicitly embedding the identified nonlinear interactions among ecosystem services into territorial spatial planning scenarios, this framework facilitated the transition from quantitative assessment to governance practice. The results showed that CES in Jiangxi Province exhibited a spatial pattern of “moderately high in the central region and relatively low around the periphery.” High-value areas for recreational opportunities, aesthetic landscapes, and related cultural services were concentrated in Nanchang, Jiujiang, and other zones where favorable natural conditions overlapped with rich cultural-historical endowments. In contrast, NES displayed a pattern of “high at the edges and low in the center,” reflecting their strong dependence on natural background conditions. Residents’ perceptions of CES were structured around a dual core of natural environmental experience and cultural-historical cognition, with long-established ethnic groups showing higher identification with and attachment to local cultural heritage. Moreover, synergistic relationships between NES and CES were mainly distributed in eco-cultural composite areas, especially around northern Poyang Lake, while trade-off relationships were concentrated in the agriculture-dominated southern regions. The study suggested that this spatial differentiation could be dynamically balanced through zonal regulation, landscape pattern optimization, and targeted cultural heritage conservation and utilization measures. Overall, the findings not only provided a new paradigm for elucidating the coupling mechanisms of the “nature-culture” system in Jiangxi Province, but also proposed a Chinese approach that could be referenced by similar regions worldwide in coordinating ecological conservation with cultural heritage transmission.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

油畅,刘雯姝,郭泺.文化与自然生态系统服务的空间模式融入区域空间治理的研究.生态学报,,(). http://dx. doi. org/[doi]

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: