毛乌素沙地不同植被类型对土壤微生物群落及生态系统多功能性的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

榆林市沙区退化草地生态-生产效益协同提升技术研发及示范(2023-CXY-180);黄土高原草地土壤有机碳库稳定性对降水变化的响应及其微生物作用机制(2025ZC-KJXX-11)


The impact of different vegetation types in the Mu Us Sandy Land on soil microbial communities and ecosystem multifunctionality
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    微生物是调控生态系统多功能性的关键参与者,但土壤微生物群落与生态系统多功能性之间的具体联系仍不清楚,特别是在沙区恢复生态系统少见报道。为此,以毛乌素沙地的四种植被类型为研究对象,测定土壤理化性质、碳组分、微生物群落组成、多样性及酶活性, 通过平均值法和单域值法计算有机碳稳定性(SCS, Soil Organic Carbon Stabilization)、养分循环(NC, Nutrient Cycling)、微生物活性(MA, Microbial Activity)等单功能和生态系统多功能性(EMF, Ecosystem Multifunctionality), 阐明不同植被类型下土壤微生物多样性及群落组成对土壤功能的调控作用。结果表明:(1)在四种植被类型中,酸杆菌门、变形菌门和子囊菌门为优势菌群;细菌和真菌Ace指数和Chao1指数在四种植被类型中均无显著性差异,而Simpson指数则均表现为典型草原显著高于荒漠草原和人工林。(2)平均值法得出的生态系统各单功能值存在显著差异,在典型草原中最高,在草原化荒漠或人工林中最低,多功能值则在两种方法中均表现为TS>DS>AF>GD。(3)典型草原各单功能值高于其他植被,对EMF贡献度最高的为SCS,平均值法得出对荒漠草原EMF贡献度最高的是NC(0.47)。(4)球囊菌门真菌、厚壁菌门以及一些未分类的真菌与MA、SCS、NC和EMF为正相关,而细菌放线菌门和真菌子囊菌门则与其呈负相关。(5)植被类型主要通过影响真菌群落组成,最终调控EMF。总体来看,真菌对EMF的解释度比细菌更高。研究探明了毛乌素沙地不同植被类型的微生物群落对EMF的影响,为当地的生态修复和生态系统管理提供了数据支持和理论支撑。

    Abstract:

    Microorganisms are key participants in regulating the multifunctionality of ecosystems, but the specific connection between soil microbial communities and ecosystem multifunctionality remains unclear, especially in restored ecosystems in sandy areas. To address this, this study focused on four vegetation types in the Mu Us Sandy Land, measuring soil physical and chemical properties, carbon components, microbial community composition, diversity, and enzyme activity. The single functions of soil organic carbon stabilization (SCS), nutrient cycling (NC), and microbial activity (MA) and ecosystem multifunctionality (EMF) were calculated using the average value method and the single domain value method to clarify the regulatory role of soil microbial diversity and community composition on soil functions under different vegetation types. The results showed that: (1) Among the four vegetation types, Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Ascomycota were the dominant microbial groups; the Ace index and Chao1 index of bacteria and fungi showed no significant differences among the four vegetation types, while the Simpson index was significantly higher in typical grassland than in desert steppe and artificial forest. (2) The single function values of the ecosystem calculated by the average value method showed significant differences, with the highest values in typical grassland and the lowest in desertified grassland or artificial forest. The multifunction values were TS > DS > AF > GD in both methods. (3) The single function values in typical grassland were higher than those in other vegetation types, and SCS contributed the most to EMF. The contribution of NC to EMF in desert steppe was the highest (0.47) as calculated by the average value method. (4) Glomeromycota fungi, Firmicutes, and some uncategorized fungi were positively correlated with MA, SCS, NC, and EMF, while Actinobacteria and Ascomycota were negatively correlated with them. (5) Vegetation types mainly regulated EMF by influencing the composition of the fungal community. Overall, fungi had a higher explanatory power for EMF than bacteria. This study clarified the influence of microbial communities in different vegetation types in the Mu Us Sandy Land on EMF, providing data support and theoretical basis for local ecological restoration and ecosystem management.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘涵文,郝洪剑,郑芳欣,阿合江·赛力克,余舟昌,王绒,张伟.毛乌素沙地不同植被类型对土壤微生物群落及生态系统多功能性的影响.生态学报,2026,46(6):3045~3061

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: