一种基于“频率-幅度-恢复力”框架的土壤侵蚀脆弱性评价方法
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

云南师范大学地理学部

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)


A soil erosion vulnerability assessment method based on the “Frequency- Magnitude -Resilience” framework
Author:
Affiliation:

1.The Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University;2.The Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University.

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    土壤侵蚀作为全球性生态环境问题,严重威胁土壤生产力和生态系统的稳定性,其时空动态演变规律与驱动机制研究对生态脆弱区可持续发展具有重要科学价值。针对传统评估方法在动态变化响应特征捕捉和生态系统恢复力评估方面的局限性,研究提出了一种基于“频率—幅度—恢复力”的土壤侵蚀脆弱性评价框架。基于1990—2022年多源时空数据,结合最优参数地理探测器模型,以典型生态脆弱区云南省为研究对象,系统解析了土壤侵蚀演变规律及其驱动机制。结果表明:(1)云南省土壤侵蚀以微度侵蚀为主(占比超76.80%),同时呈现出低强度侵蚀增加、高强度侵蚀减少的积极趋势;(2)区域土壤侵蚀脆弱性空间分异显著,稳定和较稳定区占主导地位(58.21%),同时局部区域存在较高的脆弱性(10.84%);(3)坡度对脆弱性空间分异的解释力最强(q=0.2240)。(4)驱动机制呈现梯度响应特征,稳定和较稳定区土壤侵蚀主要受气温和植被覆盖度调控;中度脆弱区受植被覆盖度和有机碳含量的共同驱动;较脆弱和极脆弱区则主要受降水和坡度的影响,且在极脆弱区,土壤性质和植被覆盖度的作用进一步增强。研究提出的“频率—幅度—恢复力”脆弱区识别方法,为土壤侵蚀评估领域提供了新的理论视角和技术工具。

    Abstract:

    Soil erosion, as a global ecological and environmental issue, severely threatens soil productivity and ecosystem stability. Investigating its spatiotemporal dynamics and driving mechanisms holds significant scientific value for the sustainable development of ecologically fragile regions. To address the limitations of traditional assessment methods in capturing dynamic response characteristics and evaluating ecosystem resilience, this study proposed a soil erosion vulnerability assessment framework based on the "Frequency-Magnitude-Resilience" paradigm. Utilizing multi-source spatiotemporal data from 1990 to 2022 and integrating the optimal parameter-based geographical detector model, this study systematically analyzed the evolution of soil erosion and its driving mechanisms in Yunnan Province, a typical ecologically fragile region. The results indicated that: (1) Mild erosion dominated in Yunnan Province, accounting for over 76.80%, with a positive trend of increasing low-intensity erosion and decreasing high-intensity erosion. (2) The spatial differentiation of soil erosion vulnerability was pronounced, with stable and relatively stable zones dominating (58.21%), while certain localized areas exhibited high vulnerability (10.84%). (3) Slope had the strongest explanatory power on the spatial differentiation of vulnerability (q = 0.2240). (4) The driving mechanisms exhibited a gradient response pattern: soil erosion in stable and relatively stable zones was primarily regulated by temperature and vegetation cover; in moderately vulnerable zones, it was jointly driven by vegetation cover and soil organic carbon content; in relatively and extremely vulnerable zones, precipitation and slope were the dominant factors, with soil properties and vegetation cover playing an increasingly significant role in extremely vulnerable areas. The "Frequency–Magnitude–Resilience" vulnerability identification method proposed in this study provided a novel theoretical perspective and technical tool for soil erosion assessment.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

马岽玲,彭双云,林之强,朱加应,金荣,崔毕婷.一种基于“频率-幅度-恢复力”框架的土壤侵蚀脆弱性评价方法.生态学报,,(). http://dx. doi. org/[doi]

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: