黄河流域水碳变量的时空变化特征及其影响因素
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.山东科技大学安全与环境工程学院;2.中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院;3.兰州交通大学测绘与地理信息学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(42161018),中国科学院青年创新促进会会员项目(2021424),黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展联合研究一期项目(2022-YRUC-01-0601),甘肃省重大科技专项项目 (23ZDKA017)


The spatiotemporal variation characteristics and influencing factors of water carbon variables in the Yellow River Basin
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Shandong University of Science and Technology;2.Northwest Institute of Ecological Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    开展陆地生态系统水碳变量变化特征及其影响因素研究对深入理解生态系统水碳循环具有重要意义。采用时空分析、空间关联交互探测器(IDSA)模型等方法,基于MODIS、ERA5-Land、土地覆盖类型和植被覆盖数据,剖析黄河流域2001—2020年蒸散发(Evapotranspiration,ET)、总初级生产力(Gross Primary Productivity,GPP)、水分利用效率(Water Use Efficiency,WUE)3个水碳变量时空变化及影响因子。结果表明:(1)时间上,2001—2020年黄河流域GPP和ET显著增加,多年均值分别为462.95 g C m?2、349.34 mm,增加速率因土地覆盖类型而异,WUE呈不显著减少趋势,多年均值为1.36 g C mm?1 m?2。(2)空间上,GPP和WUE总体呈现由东向西递减的变化特征,GPP高值区(>805.18 g C m?2)占9.90%,低值区(<330.55 g C m?2)占35.87%;WUE 高值区(>1.76 g C mm?1 m?2)占21.90%,低值区(<0.79 g C mm?1 m?2)占11.48%。ET呈现南多北少阶梯递减的变化特征,高值区(>461.71 mm)主要在黄河源区和中游下段,低值区(<243.70 mm)在黄土高原西北部。(3)不同土地利用方式对水碳循环影响突出,森林在ET、GPP和WUE上优势明显,均值分别为441.20 mm、737.90 g C m?2、1.69 g C·mm?1 m?2。(4)全流域尺度和不同土地覆盖类型尺度下植被因子是ET和GPP变化的主要影响因子,气象因子尤其是气温(T)和降水(Prec)是WUE的主要影响因子。影响因子交互作用方面,多个影响因子交互作用对WUE变化的解释力明显增强。多因子交互作用的空间模糊叠加结果显示,对黄河流域上游中下段WUE变化起主导作用是植被因子,对黄河流域中下游WUE变化起主导作用是气象因子。研究结果可为黄河流域生态保护与修复提供支撑。

    Abstract:

    Investigating the characteristics of water-carbon variables in terrestrial ecosystems and their drivers was critical for understanding ecosystem water-carbon cycles. This article adopted spatiotemporal analysis and a spatial correlation interaction detector (IDSA) model, integrating MODIS and ERA5-Land data with land cover and vegetation indices to analyze the spatiotemporal patterns (2001-2020) of evapotranspiration (ET), gross primary productivity (GPP), and water use efficiency (WUE) in the Yellow River Basin. The results showed that: (1) In terms of time, GPP and ET in the Yellow River Basin significantly increased from 2001 to 2020, with multi-year averages of 462.95 g C m?2 and 349.34 mm, respectively. The rate of increase varied depending on the land cover type, and WUE showed no significant decreasing trend, with a multi-year average of 1.36 g Cmm?1 m?2. (2) Spatially, GPP and WUE exhibited a decreasing trend from east to west, with high GPP values (>805.18 g C mm?1 m?2 ) accounting for 9.90% and low GPP values (<330.55 g C m?2) accounting for 35.87%; The high-value area of WUE (>1.76 g Cmm?1 m?2) accounted for 21.90%, while the low value area (<0.79 g C mm?1 m?2) accounted for 11.48%. ET showed a decreasing trend with more in the south and less in the north, with high-value areas (>461.71 mm) mainly located in the source and lower middle reaches of the Yellow River, and low value areas (<243.70 mm) in the northwest of the Loess Plateau. (3) Different land use patterns had a prominent impact on water carbon cycling, with forests showing significant advantages in ET, GPP, and WUE, with mean values of 441.20 mm, 737.90 g C·mm?1 m?2, and 1.69 g C mm?1 m?2, respectively. (4) Vegetation factors (FVC, LAI) were the main influencing factors of ET and GPP changes at the watershed scale and different land cover types scale, while meteorological factors, especially temperature (T) and precipitation (Prec), were the main influencing factors of WUE. In terms of the interaction of influencing factors, the explanatory power of the interaction of multiple influencing factors on WUE changes was significantly enhanced. The spatial fuzzy superposition results of multi factor interactions showed that vegetation factors played a dominant role in the WUE changes in the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River Basin, while meteorological factors played a dominant role in the WUE changes in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River Basin. The research results could provide support for ecological protection and restoration in the Yellow River Basin.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

温欣竹,尹振良,朱睿,李榕,李乐杰,张璇.黄河流域水碳变量的时空变化特征及其影响因素.生态学报,,(). http://dx. doi. org/[doi]

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: