旅游介入下保护地社区自然价值与人类福祉关系理论建构与实证
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.安徽师范大学;2.江西财经大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目)《重点生态功能区旅游地人居空间多功能转型:特征、机制与调控》(41971175)


Theoretical Framework and Empirical Study on the Nexus between the Value of Nature and Human Well-being in Tourism-Impacted Protected Area Communities
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Anhui normal university;2.Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics

Fund Project:

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (General Program) Multi-functional transformation of living spaces in tourist destinations in key ecological functional areas: characteristics, mechanisms, and regulation (41971175)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    自然价值是认知并解构自然资源与人类福祉关系的核心概念,旅游如何更好生产自然价值是管理体系转型背景下保护地高质量发展和社区人类福祉实现的内在诉求。本文基于生态系统服务理论、IPBES理论和自然关系价值理论,构建旅游介入下保护地自然价值与人类福祉关系理论框架,以国家公园候选区黄山周边农业主导型、农旅兼顾型和旅游主导型三种典型保护地社区进行实证。(1)特征分析表明:在农业主导型社区中自然工具价值生产水平较低,关系价值塑造衰减,导致福祉欠缺问题;农旅兼顾型社区中自然工具与关系价值生产较高水平集聚,福祉相对均衡;旅游主导型社区中工具价值生产空间差异显著,且经济关系价值分布悬殊,导致福祉两极分化。(2)机制分析发现:农业为主导的自然价值传统生产方式有助于维持人类福祉所需的基本物质保障和社会关系基础,但生产效率有限,无法满足人类福祉的提升需求。旅游介入应融合传统自然价值利用基础,维持自然状态和社会氛围基础;通过业态丰富工具价值生产,通过休闲机会强化非经济关系价值塑造,实现人类福祉均衡提升。

    Abstract:

    Nature's value constitutes a foundational framework for analyzing human-natural resource interdependencies and well-being linkages. How tourism can better generate the value of nature is an inherent demand for the high-quality development of protected areas and the realization of community human well-being in the context of the transformation of the management system. Integrating ecosystem service theory, IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services) framework, and nature's relational values, this paper constructs a theoretical framework for the relationship between the value of nature in protected areas and human well-being under the intervention of tourism, and conducts empirical research on three community archetypes within Huangshan's national park pilot zone: Agricultural-dominant (AD), Agri-tourism-integrated (ATI), and Tourism-dominant (TD), namely, Agriculture-led community, Agri-tourism-integrated community, and Tourism-led community. (1) The characteristic analysis shows that in Agriculture-led communities, the production level of the instrumental value of nature is relatively low, and the shaping of relational value is weakened, resulting in the problem of insufficient well-being; in Agri-tourism-integrated communities, the production of the instrumental value and relational value of nature gathers at a relatively high level, and well-being is relatively balanced; in Tourism-led communities, the spatial differences in the production of the instrumental value of nature are significant, and the distribution of economic relational value varies greatly, leading to the polarization of well-being. (2) The mechanism analysis reveals that the traditional production mode of the value of nature dominated by agriculture helps maintain the basic material guarantee and social relationship foundation required for human well-being, but its production efficiency is limited and it cannot meet the needs of improving human well-being. Tourism development strategies must synergize with traditional value utilization pathways while preserving biocultural heritage, maintain the basis of the natural state and social atmosphere; enrich the production of the instrumental value of nature through different business forms, and strengthen the shaping of non-economic relational value through leisure opportunities, so as to achieve a balanced improvement in human well-being.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

殷程强,杨兴柱,吕嘉顺,李文明.旅游介入下保护地社区自然价值与人类福祉关系理论建构与实证.生态学报,,(). http://dx. doi. org/[doi]

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: