西南高山峡谷区林下经济典型模式及水土流失分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFF1302904);国家自然科学基金项目(42261007)


Typical model of non-timber forest-based economy and analysis of soil erosion in southwest alpine canyon region
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    采用资料搜集与调查法统计归纳了西南高山峡谷区林下经济种类、分布及规模,基于土壤侵蚀影响因素和CSLE模型分析预测了不同月份和时期的土壤侵蚀量。结果表明:(1)西南高山峡谷区林下经济总面积超过24万hm2,模式主要有林下种植、林下养殖、林下采集3大类,其中林下种植面积为24.75万hm2、林下养殖规模为300万只/羽、林下采集规模8.59万t/a,根据林下种养殖种类不同又分为92种,分布较广是林下采集,规模较大的是林下种植,林下经济开发仍具有巨大潜力;(2)林下经济开发引起的地表扰动主要有清表整地、松土除草、采收扰动等方式,通过降低地表覆盖度、破坏土壤结构性等加大水土流失风险;(3)低扰动林下经济模式1(13.42t)、低扰动林下经济模式2(2.88t)、中扰动林下经济模式1(20.37t)、中扰动林下经济模式2(9.95t)、高扰动林下经济模式(61.15t)的年均土壤侵蚀模数预测值相较未开发林地增量为12.30、1.75、19.25、8.83、60.02t,增幅分别为1094%、155.85%、785.07%、1670.14%和5337.5%。水土流失增量分布在不同时期和月份,其中低扰动模式1和2、中扰动模式2、高扰动模式增量最高的月份都是6月,中扰动模式1增量最高的月份为9月。低扰动模式1的壮苗期(1—8月)土壤侵蚀模数增量占总增量的66.72%,低扰动模式2的农闲期(4—9月)土壤侵蚀模数增量占全年增量的98.86%,中扰动模式1的壮苗期(6—8月)土壤侵蚀模数增量占全年增量的45.84%,中扰动模式2的整地播种幼苗期(11—12月)土壤侵蚀模数增量占全年增量的63.25%。均分布在土壤扰动和雨季的叠加期。研究结果对于加深林下经济水土流失风险的认识,促进林下开发水土保持措施的合理应用和研发具有重要的指导意义。

    Abstract:

    Data collection and statistical investigation were employed to summarize the types, distribution, and scale of forestry economy in the southwest alpine canyon region. This paper analyzed and predicted the amount of soil erosion in different months and periods based on the influencing factors of soil erosion and the CSLE model. Results have shown that: (1) The total area of forest floor economy in the high mountain and canyon area in the southwest exceeded 240000 hm2. The main models included forest floor planting, forest floor breeding, and forest floor collection, among which the area of forest floor planting was 247500 hm2, the scale of forest floor breeding was 3 million heads, and the scale of forest floor collection was 85900 tons per year. According to the different types of forest floor planting and breeding, it could be divided into 92 types. The most widely distributed was forest floor collection, and the largest scale was forest floor planting. The development of forest floor economy still had huge potential; (2) The surface disturbance caused by understory economic development mainly included surface preparation, soil loosening and weeding, harvesting disturbance, etc., which increased the risk of soil erosion by reducing surface coverage and destroying soil structure; (3) The predicted annual soil erosion modulus values for the low disturbance undergrowth economic model 1 (13.42 t), low disturbance undergrowth economic model 2 (2.88 t), moderate disturbance undergrowth economic model 1 (20.37 t), moderate disturbance undergrowth economic model 2 (9.95 t), and high disturbance undergrowth economic model (61.15 t) were compared to the incremental values for undeveloped forestland: 12.30 t, 1.75 t, 19.25 t, 8.83 t, and 60.02 t, with the corresponding increases being 1094%, 155.85%, 785.07%, 1670.14%, and 5337.5%. The soil erosion increments were distributed across different periods and months, with the highest increments in June for low disturbance models 1 and 2, moderate disturbance model 2, and high disturbance model, while for moderate disturbance model 1, the highest increment occured in September. In low disturbance model 1, the seedling stage (January-August) accounted for 66.72% of the total soil erosion modulus increment, while in low disturbance model 2, the off-season period (April-September) accounted for 98.86% of the annual increment. In moderate disturbance model 1, the seedling stage (June-August) accounted for 45.84% of the annual increment, and in moderate disturbance model 2, the land preparation and sowing seedling stage (November-December) accounted for 63.25%. These increments were distributed during the overlapping period of soil disturbance and the rainy season. The research findings are of significant guiding value for enhancing the understanding of soil erosion risks in undergrowth economic systems and promoting the rational application and development of soil and water conservation measures in undergrowth development.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

何凡,张豪杰,李选平,马建刚,王克勤,周金星.西南高山峡谷区林下经济典型模式及水土流失分析.生态学报,2025,45(14):6691~6706

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: