基于居民生计变化的区域生态修复社会效益研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.中国科学院生态环境研究中心;2.自然资源部国土整治中心自然资源部土地科技创新中心;3.山东省地质矿产勘查开发局第七地质大队

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

沂蒙山区域山水林田湖草沙一体化保护和修复工程监控监管项目


A quantitative study on social benefits of ecological restoration based on livelihood changes
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences;2.No. 7 Geological Brigade, Shandong Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources

Fund Project:

Evaluation Program for the Yimengshan Region Shan-shui project

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    区域生态修复工程能够影响当地社会经济发展、增进居民福祉,促进区域内生式发展,但当前对于社会效益的量化缺乏具体标准。以沂蒙山区域山水林田湖草生态保护修复工程为例,基于居民可持续生计框架和指标体系,量化工程实施前后区域内居民生计活动的变化,从而分析不同修复单元之间差异的主控因子。结果表明:(1)生态保护修复工程影响居民生计策略转变。居民收入结构由务农主导型向务工主导型和兼业多项型转变,农业生产方式由人力密集型向规模化和集约化的现代经营转变,乡村产业结构由传统农耕向特色种植和乡村旅游等生态衍生产业转变;(2)生态保护修复工程对居民综合生计具有明显提升作用。整体工程区内居民综合生计水平几乎增长了一半,但不同生计类型的变化程度略有差异,由高到低为生计环境>生计结果>生计资本;(3)尽管生态保护修复工程取得了显著成效,但不同修复单元的差异较为显著。如森林提质主体修复单元等多元化收入来源的修复单元内居民生计指数最高;发展生态产业的修复单元内居民生计可持续性最高,如水质提升与污染防治单元;生计模式单一且资源匮乏的修复单元内居民生计水平偏低,如废弃矿山主体修复单元。分析不同生计类型和修复单元的变化差异性,有助于制订精准的政策和管理措施,推动生态修复事业向着更高标准、更广领域、更深层次发展,为实现区域可持续发展提供了重要支撑。

    Abstract:

    Quantifying the intricate interplay between ecological restoration initiatives and their interactions with both the natural environment and various socio-economic factors is of immense importance. This understanding is crucial for fostering intrinsic development in ecologically vulnerable regions, as well as for enhancing the well-being of local residents. By delving into the mechanisms that drive this interplay, we can better comprehend how these initiatives can be optimized for the benefit of both the environment and the communities that depend on it. Utilizing the ecological conservation and restoration efforts of the Shan-shui initiative in the Yimeng Mountain area as a case study, this research aims to assess the project within the framework of sustainable livelihoods for the local inhabitants. The study quantifies the shifts in the livelihood activities of local residents before and after the implementation of the project. It also examines the principal factors that account for the disparities observed among different restoration units, thereby identifying the unique challenges and opportunities. Furthermore, this research devises targeted strategies aimed at bolstering the sustainability of residents' livelihoods in the context of these ecological initiatives. The results of this analysis reveal several key findings: (1) The ecological conservation and restoration initiative has had a profound impact on the livelihood strategies employed by residents in the area. Specifically, this initiative has facilitated a significant shift in their income structure, transitioning from a model predominantly reliant on active farming to one that is increasingly oriented towards labor-based and part-time work opportunities. In addition to this shift, the methods of agricultural production have undergone a transformation as well, evolving from traditional, labor-intensive practices to large-scale, intensive modern management techniques. This transition exhibits a broader change in the rural economy, moving away from traditional farming practices towards the development of ecological derivative economy. These types of economy include specialty planting and rural tourism, both of which are increasingly becoming vital components of the local economy. (2) Moreover, the ecological conservation and restoration endeavor has markedly enhanced the overall livelihood of the residents in the project area. The overall level of the residents' comprehensive livelihood has nearly doubled as a result of these efforts, with the degree of change varying slightly among different livelihood types. This variation can be observed in a descending order of impact as follows: livelihood environment, livelihood results, and livelihood capital. (3) While the ecological protection and restoration project has achieved remarkable results overall, it is important to note that the differences among various restoration units are particularly pronounced. For instance, the livelihood index is highest in those restoration units that boast diversified income sources, such as the main forest enhancement restoration unit. Conversely, the sustainability of livelihoods is found to be highest in units that have successfully developed ecological industries, exemplified by the water quality enhancement and pollution prevention unit. In stark contrast, the livelihood level remains low in those restoration units characterized by a single livelihood mode and limited resources, such as the primary abandoned mine restoration unit. An in-depth analysis of the diversity of livelihood types and the conditions of different restoration units will provide valuable insights that can aid in crafting tailored policies and management strategies. This nuanced approach will not only propel ecological restoration efforts to a higher standard but also expand their scope and deepen their impact. Ultimately, these efforts will provide crucial support for the achievement of sustainable development in the region, ensuring that both ecological and community needs are met in a harmonious and balanced manner.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

马庆,苏香燕,周妍,李付全,张永帅,胡自远,李凯,孙然好.基于居民生计变化的区域生态修复社会效益研究.生态学报,,(). http://dx. doi. org/[doi]

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: