青稞苗期根腐病不同发病率农田植株根际土壤真菌群落差异
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(32060037);甘肃省农业科学院重点研发计划项目(2023GAAS22)


Differences in fungal communities within the rhizosphere soil of naked barley at various incidences of seedling root rot in the field
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    青稞苗期根腐病发生广泛、危害严重,明确不同发病率条件下根际土壤真菌群落差异,对其精准、高效防控意义重大。以青稞苗期农田内健康(MH)和根腐病发病率为5%(MD1)、10%(MD2)、15%(MD3)、20%(MD4)根际土壤为研究对象,提取其总DNA,扩增18S rDNA区,通过Illumina-Miseq平台进行高通量测序,分类、注释所得序列,分析其群落物种多样性、物种组成及结构差异。结果表明:MD2特有OTU及OTU总数最多,MD1最少,MD2与MD3共有OTU最多,MD2物种丰富度维度、遗传距离指数、丰富度估计量指数均显著最高。随发病率升高,优势菌门子囊菌门、担子菌门相对丰度降低,分别显著富集于MD1、MD3;毛霉菌门与子囊菌门变化规律一致。优势菌纲粪壳菌纲显著富集于MH中,植株发病后其丰度下降;座囊菌纲、锤舌菌纲、盘菌纲在MD1中显著富集,球囊霉纲在MD2中相对丰度最高,在MD3中最低。发病样本中,盘菌科、口蘑科、粪盘菌科、暗壳腔菌科等优势菌科相对丰度总体变化与发病率呈负相关,发病后盘菌科丰度显著降低;MD1与MD2真菌多样性与群落结构组成相似度较高,MD3则与MD4相似度更高。因此,青稞苗期根腐病的发生使不同菌群间的健康良性互作平衡被打破,发病初期激活了植物根际系统防御机制,刺激有益菌群富集,流行后期病原真菌占据主导地位,有益菌群被抑制,真菌群落物种多样性降低。

    Abstract:

    Seedling root rot is widespread and devastating to naked barley,yet the differences of fungal community in rhizosphere soil across differing disease incidences remain unclear,hindering the development of specific and effective control strategies. To clarify these dynamics,rhizosphere soil samples from healthy (MH) and seedling naked barley affected by root rot with incidences of 5% (MD1),10% (MD2),15% (MD3),and 20% (MD4) were selected for DNA extraction,with the 18S rDNA region amplified and subjected to high-throughput sequencing via Illumina-Miseq. These sequences were classified taxonomically,annotated,and analyzed to identify differences in fungal community diversity,composition,and structure. The OTU classification outcomes indicated that MD2 harbored the greatest number of OTUs and unique OTUs,whereas MD1 contained the fewest. The shared OTUs between MH and MD1,MD1 and MD4 were minimal,contrasted with the abundant shared OTUs between MH and MD3. Observed species,PD whole tree,and Chao1 indices of MD2 were significantly the highest among the samples. Examining fungal community structure and composition at various taxonomic levels,along with LEfSe (Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size) analysis,showed that the relative abundance of dominant phyla,such as Ascomycota and Basidiomycota,displayed opposing trends with escalating disease incidence,with notable enrichment in MD1 and MD3,respectively. The dominant class Sordariomycetes was enriched in MH and its abundance waned post-infection. Classes such as Dothideomycetes,Leotiomycetes,and Pezizomycetes were enriched in MD1. Glomerales showed peak abundance in MD2 and a nadir in MD3. In diseased samples,the relative abundance of dominant families like Pezizaceae,Tricholomataceae,Ascobolaceae,and Phaeosphaeriaceae generally inversely changed with the changing incidence. The abundance of Pezizaceae significantly declined,but other families with variable increases. Correlation clustering and PCA analysis indicated that the fungal diversity and community structures of MD3 and MD4 were similar,as were those of MD1 and MD2 to a greater extent. These insights imply that during the spread of seedling root rot,pathogenic fungi impede the enrichment of other microbial communities,diminishing fungal species diversity and disrupting the equilibrium of beneficial interactions among microorganisms. Moreover,the prevalent pathogenic groups vary with different incidences,and the functional impact of the same microbial community differs across naked barley fields. The incipient phase of root rot (5%-10% incidence) may stimulate rhizosphere defense of fungi and promote beneficial microbial enrichment to sustain soil ecological stability. However,the capacity for self-stabilization of rhizosphere soil fungal community is limited,allowing pathogenic fungi to dominate,beneficial fungal communities are suppressed,and fungal community species diversity decreases in the later prevalence of the disease (15%-20% incidence).

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

许世洋,李雪萍,漆永红,李建军.青稞苗期根腐病不同发病率农田植株根际土壤真菌群落差异.生态学报,2025,45(8):3907~3920

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: