狼、豺和赤狐的时空生态分布特征
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与自然保护研究所;2.中国林业科学研究院生态保护与修复研究所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

第三次新疆综合科学考察项目(2021xjkk1203);安南坝地区豺食性分析和栖息地选择研究”(2023kj50);雪豹分布专项调查研究技术咨询项目;新疆罗布泊野骆驼国家级自然保护区综合科学考察项目.


Spatial and temporal relationships among Wolf (Canis lupus), Dhole (Cuon alpinus), and Red fox (Vulpes vulpes)
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Ecology 2.and 3.Nature 4.Conservation 5.Institute, 6.Chinese 7.Academy 8.of 9.Forestry;10.0

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    狼(Canis lupus)、豺(Cuon alpinus)和赤狐(Vulpes vulpes)是生态系统中的重要捕食者,探究其种间时空生态特征具有重要的生物学和保护意义。基于2021—2024年在青藏高原东北缘的新疆阿尔金山国家级自然保护区、罗布泊野骆驼国家级自然保护区和甘肃安南坝野骆驼国家级自然保护区开展的红外相机调查监测数据,使用参数优化的最大熵模型(Maxent)与核密度法比较了狼、豺和赤狐的种间与种内时空生态位差异。结果发现:(1)优化后的Maxent模型狼、豺和赤狐AUC值分别为0.966、0.941和0.960,狼栖息地的关键因子为归一化植被指数(26.1%)、海拔(14.8%)和距铁路距离(14.0%),豺为坡度(62.1%)、归一化植被指数(23.2%)和距铁路距离(3.1%),赤狐为归一化植被指数(29.3%)、海拔(16.5%)和距铁路距离(12.5%)。(2)狼、豺和赤狐的空间生态位重叠度较高,适宜栖息地空间重叠度系数分别为0.53(狼-豺)、0.78(狼-赤狐)和0.63(豺-赤狐)。(3)三种食肉动物的时间生态位存在明显分化(P<0.05),狼的活动高峰期晚于豺,赤狐明显回避狼和豺的活动。本研究揭示了青藏高原东北缘狼、豺和赤狐在时间生态位上的分化是其同域共存的关键因素,为食肉动物的保护研究提供了参考。

    Abstract:

    Wolves (Canis lupus), dholes (Cuon alpinus), and red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) constitute key members of terrestrial predator guilds. Investigating the spatial and temporal ecological characteristics of interspecific interactions among these species holds significant biological and conservation value. Utilizing 2021-2024 infrared camera data from the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau's northeastern margin, including the Xinjiang Altun Mountain National Nature Reserve, Xinjiang Lop Nur Wild Camel National Nature Reserve, and the Gansu Annanba National Nature Reserve, we employed enhanced MaxEnt modeling with kernel density estimation to quantify interspecific niche differentiation among and within wolves, dholes, and red foxes. The results showed that: (1) The enhanced MaxEnt model demonstrated excellent predictive performance (AUC: wolf=0.966, dhole=0.941, red fox=0.960). Key habitat factors for wolves were the NDVI (26.1%), elevation (14.8%), and distance to railway (14%); for dholes, they were slope (62.1%), NDVI (23.2%), and distance to railway (3.1%); and for red foxes, they were the NDVI (29.3%), elevation (16.5%), and distance to railway (12.5%). (2) The spatial niche overlap among wolves, dholes, and red foxes was relatively high, with habitat spatial overlap indices: wolf-dhole=0.53, wolf-red fox=0.78, dhole-red fox=0.63, respectively. Additionally, the infrared camera data recorded that the average elevation for wolves was (3053±775)m, for dholes (3231±737)m, and for red foxes (3297±787)m. This indicates that red foxes have the broadest spatial range, followed by wolves, with dholes having the narrowest range.(3) Wolves, dholes, and red foxes are active throughout the year. Wolves and dholes are primarily diurnal, while red foxes are primarily nocturnal. The daily activity rhythms of wolves and red foxes are unimodal, while dholes exhibit a bimodal pattern. Intraspecifically, wolves and red foxes have high overlap across different seasons, whereas dholes have a low overlap coefficient across seasons. (4) There was significant temporal niche differentiation (P<0.05) among the three carnivores, with wolves being active later than dholes, and red foxes clearly avoiding the activity periods of both wolves and dholes. This study reveals that temporal niche differentiation among wolves, dholes, and red foxes in the northeastern edge of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is a key foundation for the coexistence of sympatric species, establishing a scientific framework for conserving sympatric canids and mesocarnivores. Since this study only analyzed the ecological relationships among wolves, dholes, and red foxes from spatial and temporal perspectives, without considering factors such as nutritional differences and the uniformity of infrared camera deployment, future research could further utilize more comprehensive or novel survey and monitoring technologies to comprehensively elucidate the coexistence mechanisms of these three species in the region from nutritional, temporal, and spatial perspectives

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

黄太福,张溢,刘晓敏,丛微,余建华,李佳,薛亚东,张于光.狼、豺和赤狐的时空生态分布特征.生态学报,,(). http://dx. doi. org/[doi]

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: