基于生态安全格局与风险评价的生态修复优先区识别:以神木市为例
作者:
作者单位:

长安大学建筑学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFC3802803)


Identification of Ecological Restoration Priority Areas Based on Ecological Security Patterns and Risk Assessment: A Case Study of Shenmu City
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Architecture,Chang’an University,Xi’an

Fund Project:

National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC3802803)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    生态安全格局是我国划定生态用地,完善和落实生态功能区、主体功能区等区域调控政策的有效工具,可通过落实相关法律法规引导限制无序的城市扩张和人类活动,实现国土、区域和城市等各尺度上的生态安全永久性保护。神木市煤炭资源开发产生了一系列生态问题,虽然政府已采取了一些措施并取得了不错成效,但是由于能源转型压力和对生态修复的认知不足,依然存在关键生态源地忽视、煤矿塌陷影响认识不足等问题,亟需对神木市生态修复策略进行更为科学合理的优化。本研究基于“生态安全格局构建-生态风险评价-修复分区-管理策略优化”的基本研究框架,将生态系统服务功能评价与电路理论方法结合,构建神木市具备最优生态廊道宽度的生态安全格局,并与矿区塌陷、山体滑坡、水体污染、地表破坏和土地荒漠化生态风险评价进行叠加,采用冲突分析方法确定关键生态要素的冲突类型与等级,识别出生态修复的重点区域。研究结果表明:神木市生态安全格局共计识别出生态源地37个,斑块面积达到1,139.2 km2;生态廊道70条,总长度达380.0km,最优廊道宽度设定累积阻力阈值为80k;生态夹点大于1 km2的有28个,总面积达到140.4km2。综合生态风险冲突评价结果:店塔镇、西沙街道、锦界镇和孙家岔镇处于较高级冲突以上,是神木市受采矿活动影响较为严重的区域。基于生态要素分布与生态风险评价等级,综合确定了神木市矿山修复区、荒漠化防治区、综合服务区和水土保持区四大生态修复分区。本研究改进了传统生态修复分区划定模式,探索集“摸清生态基底-识别修复空间-优化保护对策”于一体的县域生态修复技术体系,将研究落实到具体的乡镇级行政区,使理论研究能更加有针对性的指导县域生态修复与管理。同时,可为黄河中游地区同类资源开发型城市的生态安全格局构建和生态修复策略实施提供理论依据。

    Abstract:

    The ecological security pattern is an effective tool for delineating ecological land use and improving and implementing regional control policies such as ecological function zones and main functional zones in China. It can guide and restrict the disorderly expansion of cities and human activities by implementing relevant laws and regulations, thus achieving permanent protection of ecological security at various scales, such as national territory, regions, and cities. The coal resource development in Shenmu City has resulted in a series of ecological problems. Despite the government"s implementation of certain measures and their positive outcomes, there remain unresolved issues, including the neglect of crucial ecological source areas, insufficient comprehension of the consequences of coal mine subsidence caused by energy transition pressures, and a lack of awareness regarding ecological restoration. It is urgently needed to optimize the ecological restoration strategy of Shenmu City more scientifically and reasonably. This study is based on the basic research framework of “construction of ecological security pattern - ecological risk assessment - restoration zoning - optimization of management strategies”. It combines ecosystem service function evaluation with circuit theory methods to construct an ecological security pattern with the optimal ecological corridor width for Shenmu City. This study encompasses ecological risk assessments related to mine subsidence, landslide, water pollution, surface damage, and land desertification. It employs conflict analysis techniques to ascertain the nature and intensity of conflicts among crucial ecological components, thereby identifying priority zones for ecological restoration. The results show that the ecological security pattern of Shenmu City encompasses 37 ecological sources, covering a patch area of 1,139.2 km2. Additionally, there are 70 ecological corridors spanning a total length of 380.0 km, with an optimal corridor width determined by a cumulative resistance threshold of 80 k. Furthermore, the analysis reveals the presence of 28 ecological pinch points, occupying a combined area of 140.4 km2.Dianta Town, Xisha Street, Jinjie Town, and Sunjiacha Town in Shenmu City are the areas most impacted by mining activities, as indicated by their higher or above-average level of ecological risk conflict in the comprehensive evaluation. Based on the distribution of ecological elements and the level of ecological risks, four restoration zones were identified in Shenmu City, namely mining restoration zone, desertification prevention zone, comprehensive service zone, and water and soil conservation zone. This study improves the traditional ecological restoration zoning model, explores a county-level ecological restoration technical system that integrates “understanding ecological base - identifying restoration space - optimizing protection measures”, and implements research in specific township-level administrative areas, thereby making theoretical research more targeted in guiding county-level ecological restoration and management. At the same time, it can provide reference for the construction of ecological security patterns and the implementation of ecological restoration strategies for similar resource development-oriented cities in the middle reaches of the Yellow River region.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李欣,郑颖,陈安宁,周吉喆,李青泽,侯全华.基于生态安全格局与风险评价的生态修复优先区识别:以神木市为例.生态学报,,(). http://dx. doi. org/10.5846/stxb202403090480

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: