水稻生产外部性价值时空演绎及驱动力——以2000—2021年我国30个省市为例
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金资助项目(21BJY257)


Spatiotemporal evolution and driving forces of the externality value in rice production: a study of 30 provinces in China from 2000—2021
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    水稻生产间接价值研究主要集中于生态系统服务功能而较少关注外部性问题,文章创新性地评估了水稻生产外部性价值,以及对粮食生产生态化转型的重大意义。基于2000—2021年我国水稻生产面板数据,运用功能价值法、热点分析和空间自相关等方法,结合地理探测器和地理加权回归,评估水稻生产外部性价值,并分析其时空演变特征及驱动因素。结果表明:(1)我国水稻生产年均正、负外部性价值和净价值分别为6030.67、2080.27和3950.48亿元;正外部性价值构成中涵养水源(34.84%)和气体调节(23.41%)占比最大,负外部性价值构成以温室气体排放(35.93%)和化肥污染(20.71%)为主。(2)正外部性价值整体呈缓慢增长态势,增幅8.78%;以2012年新时代为分界点,负外部性价值呈“先增后减”趋势,体现了新时代生态防控成效。(3)空间异质性强,外部性价值集聚于胡焕庸线以东,其中华中、华南、西南、东北和华北稻作区年均净值分别为1744.84、573.24、739.47、496.51和337.65亿元;外部性价值与地理空间全局正相关且空间聚集效应整体减弱;华中和华南稻作区以热点区和“高-高”聚集为主,华北和西北稻作区以冷点区、“低-低”聚集和不显著为主。(4)外部性价值受自然和社会经济因子耦合协调,呈双因子增强态势,其中机械总动力和可变农资对其影响最大;不同空间的水稻生产外部性价值的驱动力存在明显的空间异质性,南方稻作区相比于北方稻作区在社会因素方面影响力度更大。

    Abstract:

    Research on the indirect value of rice production has primarily focused on ecosystem service functions, with less emphasis on externalities. This article conducts an innovative evaluation of the externality value of rice production and its significant impact on the ecological transformation of grain production. Utilizing the Chinese panel data on rice production from 2000 to 2021, the study applies methods such as the functional value approach, hotspot analysis, and spatial autocorrelation, in conjunction with geodetectors and geographically weighted regression, to assess the externality value of rice production. It further analyzes the spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of these externalities. Findings include: (1) the annual average positive, negative, and net externality values of Chinese rice production are 603.067 billion, 208.027 billion, and 395.048 billion yuan, respectively. The composition of positive externality values includes primarily water conservation (34.84%) and gas regulation (23.41%), whereas greenhouse gas emissions (35.93%) and fertilizer pollution (20.71%) constitute the primary components of the negative externality values. (2) The overall trend for positive externality value indicates a slow growth, with increase of 8.78%; post-2012, marked as the beginning of a new era, the negative externality value shows a trend of initial increase followed by a decrease, demonstrating the effectiveness of ecological prevention and control in this new era. (3) The strongly spatial heterogeneity is evident, with the concentration of externality values predominantly in areas east of the Hu Line. In the rice-producing regions, the annual average net values in Central China, South China, Southwest China, Northeast China, and North China are 174.484 billion, 57.324 billion, 73.947 billion, 49.651 billion, and 33.765 billion yuan, respectively. Externality values demonstrate a positive global correlation with geographic space, and the overall spatial clustering effect is weakened. In Central and South China, hotspot areas and high-high clustering predominate, while in North China and Northwest China, coldspot areas, low-low clustering, and non-significance are more prevalent. (4) Externalities are influenced by the coordinated interaction of natural and socio-economic factors, exhibiting a dual-factor enhancement trend. The significant impacts arise from total mechanical power and variable agricultural inputs. Spatial heterogeneity in the driving forces of externalities is evident across different regions, with social factors exert a greater influence in the southern areas compared to the northern ones.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

周镕基,骆丽庄,吴思斌.水稻生产外部性价值时空演绎及驱动力——以2000—2021年我国30个省市为例.生态学报,2024,44(21):9552~9566

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: