景观功能评估研究进展
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

推进以国家公园为主体的自然保护地体系建设研究(23AZD062);第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究项目(2019QZKK0401)


Landscape functional assessment research progress and insights
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    景观是由不同土地单元镶嵌而成的异质区域,通过提供粮食安全、物种维持、生计机会、文化娱乐等功能为提高人类福祉做出重要贡献。景观功能评估作为支撑可持续发展的关键工具,旨在评价区域可持续发展潜力进而指导相关决策。为明确景观功能评估的内涵、理清整体性景观功能评估的研究框架,依据研究重点将景观功能评估分为感知、生态、特性及绩效四维度,综合评述各维度的评估内涵、评估方法并提出展望。结果表明:①感知维度初步实现从主观判断向数据驱动的转变,但由于受设备、专业技术等制约,数据获取相对困难,质量评估、效果评估或偏好研究相较传统研究发展缓慢;②生态维度涉及范畴已基本建立各自的研究框架、研究方法,但还需建立更精准的评估框架才能为挖掘生态系统演变的时空动态特征、关键驱动因子提供技术支撑;③特性维度能够帮助景观规划者、决策者增加对景观现状、形成及其未来的认知,核心问题为“在考虑人文、历史、审美、生态价值的基础上实现景观分类”;④绩效维度注重景观的可持续发展,正处于研究初期尚欠缺对景观规划管理策略与效益结果之间关联性的探讨。研究认为,景观功能评估呈现出多维度交叉、结合多种理论及方法的发展趋势,整体上对景观的社会历史文化特征关注较少,欠缺多维度交叉的景观功能评估研究框架。未来应从景观特征挖掘、景观功能图谱制作、景观功能评估、景观绩效评估四个方面予以加强,构建面向多尺度、多目标的整体性景观功能评估方法体系,以改善整体性景观功能评估方案制定方面的不足。

    Abstract:

    Landscape is a heterogeneous area composed of different land units, which makes important contributions to improving human well-being by providing functions such as food security, species maintenance, livelihood opportunities, cultural and recreational activities. Landscape function assessment, as a pivotal tool facilitating sustainable development, aims to assess the potential for sustainable development in a given region and provide guidance for related decision-making. In order to elucidate the connotation of landscape function assessment and establish a clear research framework for comprehensive landscape function assessment, this paper categorizes the assessment into four dimensions: perception, ecology, characteristics, and performance based on the research focus. Furthermore, it provides a comprehensive review of each dimension's connotation, assessment methods, while also presenting future prospects. The findings suggest that: ①The preliminary implementation of perceptual dimensions has successfully shifted from subjective judgment to data-driven approaches. However, due to constraints such as limited availability of devices and lack of professional expertise, data acquisition remains relatively challenging. As a result, there hasn't been significant progress in quality assessment, performance evaluation or preference research when compared to traditional studies; ②In terms of ecological dimensions, the respective research frameworks and methods have been established to a certain extent. However, it is still necessary to establish a more precise evaluation framework in order to provide technical support for exploring the spatiotemporal dynamic characteristics and key driving factors of ecosystem evolution; ③The core issue of the feature dimension focuses on is "achieving landscape classification based on considering humanistic, historical, aesthetic, and ecological values", which presents a problem of diverse theoretical systems. The widely accepted and commonly used theoretical systems have not yet formed standards or regulations; ④The performance dimension emphasizes the sustainable development of landscapes, and is currently in the early stages of research with a lack of exploration on the correlation between landscape planning management strategies and their resulting benefits.In general, the assessment of landscape functionality demonstrates a trend towards multidimensional intersections and the integration of various theories and methods. However, there remains a relative neglect of the social, historical, and cultural aspects of landscapes, as well as a dearth of research frameworks for comprehensive landscape functional assessment. In the future, efforts should be made to strengthen landscape feature exploration, landscape functional map creation, landscape functional assessment, and landscape performance evaluation,to establish a comprehensive landscape functional assessment methodology that is multi-scale and multi-objective. This will help address the shortcomings in developing comprehensive landscape functional assessment plans.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李代超,钟淑璇,虞虎.景观功能评估研究进展.生态学报,2024,44(16):7401~7415

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: