海峡两岸生态环境质量差异性评价及港口发展对其的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

福建省科技计划项目(2022H0044);福建省自然科学基金面上项目(2023J01798);福建省自然科学基金青年项目(2021J05169);厦门市科技计划项目(3502Z20191021)


Ecological quality differentiation of the environment and impacts of port development on both coasts of the Taiwan Strait
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    21世纪以来,中国城市化进程不断加快,大量人口涌入沿海地区,海峡两岸经贸活动也越来越频繁,导致脆弱的沿海地区面临较大的生态风险,因此动态监测并评价两岸生态质量对推动两岸城市生态文明建设及促进两岸和谐统一发展具有重要意义。利用谷歌地球引擎(GEE)平台调用2000-2022年Landsat及MODIS数据集,采用主成分分析法构建遥感生态指数的基础上,运用差值分析、空间自相关分析评价两岸生态环境质量的差异性,并在建立两岸主要港口多环缓冲区的基础上探讨港口规模及其周边城市建设对生态环境质量的影响。结果表明:(1)2000-2010年海峡两岸生态环境质量呈"西升东降"的特征,2010-2022年海峡两岸生态环境质量均呈波动上升趋势,新冠疫情期间呈先增后减的趋势,两岸生态环境质量差距逐渐缩小。(2)东岸生态环境质量优于西岸,生态环境质量优良等级区域主要分布在太姥山、玉山山脉等山地区域,较差等级区域主要分布在湖里区和晋江市等城市工业聚集区,2000-2010年生态环境质量等级显著退化的区域主要为东岸的山地区域,2010-2020年等级显著退化的区域主要为西岸的沿海区域。(3)两岸生态环境质量具有较强的空间自相关性,处于山地区域的城市呈高值聚集,西岸的厦漳泉、福州市和莆田市以及东岸近海岸城市呈低值聚集。(4)海峡两岸港口规模及其周边城市建设对生态环境质量的影响具有相似性,离港口距离越远,城市建设用地面积占比越小,生态环境质量越好,班轮运输阶段港口规模越大其周边生态环境质量也越差;直航运输阶段港口规模对生态环境质量的影响减弱并逐步改善。(5)受新冠疫情影响,港口周边生态环境质量稍有转好,且西岸港口规模较大的厦门港和福州港较东岸港口更注重生态建设。研究可为海峡两岸城市生态文明建设提供基础数据支撑,也为生态港口规划提供科学决策依据,同时为促进两岸和谐发展提供助力。

    Abstract:

    Since the 21st century, there has been an influx of people into the coastal areas with the rapid urbanization process in China, and the trade activities of both coasts of the Taiwan Strait became more and more frequent, which led to ecological risks along the fragile seaboard. Therefore, it is important to dynamically monitor and evaluate the ecological quality of both coasts of the Taiwan Strait, which will promote ecological civilization construction and harmonious development across the Taiwan Strait. In this paper, Google Earth Engine platform was used to invoke the datasets of Landsat and MODIS from 2000 to 2022, based on which principal component analysis was adopted to construct the remote sensing-based ecological index. Then, difference analysis and spatial autocorrelation analysis were used to evaluate the eco-environmental quality differentiation of the Cross-Strait. In addition, the multi-ring buffer zones were established to study the effects of the size of main ports and city construction on the eco-environmental quality of the Cross-Strait. The results showed that: (1) from 2000 to 2010, the trend of eco-environmental quality was raised on the western coast and declined on the eastern coast of the Cross-Strait, and it was wavelike raised from 2010 to 2022 with the narrowing of the gap of the eco-environmental quality of the Cross-Strait. (2) The eastern coast's eco-environment was of higher quality than the western coast's. The eco-environmental quality level of Taimu Mountain and Yushan Mountain was excellent and good, and the relatively poor level was mainly in Huli District and Jinjiang City. Areas with significantly degraded eco-environmental quality levels were the mountainous regions on the eastern coast from 2000 to 2010, and the western coastal regions from 2010 to 2020. (3) There was a strong spatial correlation of the eco-environmental quality among cities on both coasts of the Strait, which showed that the remote sensing-based ecological index in the mountainous regions was higher and aggregated, while in the offshore regions was lower and aggregated. (4) On both coasts of the Strait, the effects of port size and its nearby urban construction on the eco-environmental quality were similar, showing that the eco-environmental quality was higher in areas farther away from the ports and where the proportion of urban construction was lesser. In the liner shipping stage, the eco-environmental quality around ports was worse when the port size was larger; the port size had a weaker impact on the eco-environmental quality which improved in the direct shipping stage. (5) Additionally, the eco-environmental quality of nearby ports slightly improved during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the ecological construction was taken seriously in Xiamen Port and Fuzhou Port. This study could provide basic data support for the construction of urban ecological civilization and a scientific decision-making basis for the plan of the ecological port, and could provide a boost to promote harmonious development on both coasts of the Taiwan Strait.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘江容,林晓凤,王豪伟,王翠平.海峡两岸生态环境质量差异性评价及港口发展对其的影响.生态学报,2024,44(5):1837~1853

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: