重点生态功能区农户的相对贫困程度及影响因素 ——以陇南山区为例
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.西北师范大学;2.甘肃省陇南市野生动植物管理保护站

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(41971268)


Relative poverty degree and influencing factors of farmers in key ecological function areas -- A case study of Longnan Mountain Area
Author:
Affiliation:

1.northwest Normal University;2.Gansu Longnan Wildlife Management and Protection Station

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    重点生态功功能区面临着严峻的生计与生态冲突,科学评估重点生态功能区的相对贫困程度,精准识别相对贫困人口对于促进重点生态功能区生计与生态协同发展至关重要。鉴于此,本文基于可持续生计分析框架,利用农户调查数据,通过构建相对贫困测度指标体系,系统识别相对贫困农户,并利用分层线性模型在“家庭-村庄”双重尺度上探索相对贫困的关键影响因素。结果发现:(1)陇南山区农户相对贫困程度存在分化,其中,高山区农户、补贴型农户和高家庭抚养农户相对贫困程度较高。相对贫困农户占受访户的20.39%,且主要集中在高山区、户主受教育水平较低、家庭抚养比较高以及补贴型农户中。(2)农户的家庭属性是导致农户陷入相对贫困的决定性因素,脱贫内生动力及生计多样性提升是缓解相对贫困的关键因素,而医疗负担和教育负担增加会导致农户陷入相对贫困。(3)村庄特征放大了家庭特征对相对贫困程度的影响,村庄自然条件、社会经济条件、对外联系等通过影响家庭特征而强化了对农户相对贫困程度的影响。

    Abstract:

    It is facing severe livelihood and ecological conflicts in the key ecological functional areas. Scientific assessment of the relative poverty level and accurate identification of the relatively poor population are crucial to promoting the coordinated development of livelihood and ecology in the key ecological functional areas. In view of this, based on the framework of sustainable livelihood analysis, this paper uses farmer survey data to systematically identify relative poor households by constructing the relative poverty measurement index system, and uses hierarchical linear model to explore the key influencing factors of relative poverty at the "family-village" dual scale. The results show that :(1) the relative poverty degree of farmers in longnan mountainous area is differentiated, among which, the relative poverty degree of farmers in high mountainous area, subsidized farmers and farmers with high family dependency are higher. Relatively poor households accounted for 20.39% of the surveyed households, and were mainly concentrated in high mountainous areas, households with low educational level, high family support and subsidized households. (2) The household attributes of farmers are the decisive factors leading to relative poverty, the endogenous motivation of poverty alleviation and the improvement of livelihood diversity are the key factors alleviating relative poverty, while the increase of medical burden and education burden will lead to relative poverty of farmers. (3) Village characteristics magnify the impact of family characteristics on the relative poverty degree, and the natural conditions, social and economic conditions and external contacts of villages strengthen the impact on the relative poverty degree of farmers through influencing family characteristics.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李文青,赵雪雁,何小风.重点生态功能区农户的相对贫困程度及影响因素 ——以陇南山区为例.生态学报,,(). http://dx. doi. org/[doi]

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: