生物入侵研究国际进展与中国现状——基于CiteSpace的文献计量分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家社科重大项目(20ZDA085);国家自然科学基金(4177111);中国博士后科学基金(2022M722055,2022TQ0205)


International progress of biological invasion research and the status quo in China——the bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (General Program, Key Program, Major Research Plan), National Social Science Fund, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    生物入侵是造成全球生物多样性降低和生境变化的重要因素,并在世界各地造成巨大的经济损失与生态灾害,然而系统研究生物入侵的研究进展与趋势的文章却较少。基于Web of Science核心库、Scopus以及中国知网,运用CiteSpace知识图谱可视化软件,分析生物入侵的国内外研究进展。结果表明:(1)美国对生物入侵的研究起步最早(1970年),国外的文章数量在1990年后呈指数增长。国外研究机构及作者间合作强度大,形成以美国各大高校为中心的合作网络。国外注重生物入侵的驱动因素、压力及入侵状态的研究。近年来国外研究热点涉及入侵物种的种群动态、扩散机制、生态模型、岛屿入侵、风险评估、气候变化及国际贸易等,并越来越重视气候变化与多元驱动因素相互作用下的生物入侵,但对外来微生物和无脊椎动物的研究较少。(2)我国相关研究始于20世纪90年代,文章数量在2000-2010年间增长迅速。但国内研究机构及作者间合作强度较低,呈现多核心的分散合作关系。国内注重生物入侵的危害及缓解措施研究。研究热点有入侵途径、机制、危害、防治策略、全球贸易、气候变化与风险评估等,并越来越关注"一带一路"下的生物入侵及人工智能等科学防治手段。但是近十年,不同聚类的关注度和热度都在降低,对入侵驱动机制及预警监测的研究较为薄弱。(3)未来我国应当突出研究重点,与国际研究保持同步,强化全球贸易、气候变化与多元驱动因素相互作用下的生物入侵研究,构建生物入侵的驱动-压力-状态-响应的综合评估体系。基于对生物入侵研究进展的系统认知,可为我国科学防治生物入侵提供理论支撑。

    Abstract:

    Biological invasion is an important factor of global biodiversity decline and habitat change,and has caused huge economic losses and ecological disasters around the world. However, there are still very limited articles which systematically exploring the research progress and trends of biological invasion. Based on the core database of Web of Science, Scopus and CNKI, and using the CiteSpace software, this paper analyzes the research progress and trends of biological invasion in China and abroad. The results show that: (1) the research on biological invasion started earliest in the United States in 1970, followed by developed countries in Western Europe and Australia, and the number of related articles abroad increased exponentially after 1990. The cooperation between foreign research institutions and authors is strong, forming a cooperative network centered on universities such as University of California, University of Florida and Colorado State University in the United States. Foreign research focused on the driving factors, invasion pressure and invasion state of biological invasion. In recent years, foreign research hotspots included population dynamics of invasive species, diffusion mechanisms, ecological models, invasion on island, risk assessment, climate change and international trade. More and more attention has been paid to biological invasions under the interaction of climate change and multiple driving factors, but there were few studies on alien microorganisms and invertebrates. (2) Relevant research in China began in the 1990s, and the number of related articles increased rapidly from 2000 to 2010. The cooperation intensity between domestic research institutions and authors is relatively low, with Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences and Hainan University as the main research organizations, presenting a multi-core and decentralized cooperative network. Focuses were on the negative impacts of biological invasion and its mitigation measure. Research hotspots included invasion routes, invasion mechanisms, invasion hazards, prevention strategies, global trade, climate change and risk assessment. More and more attention has been paid to biological invasion under the “Belt and Road” and scientific prevention methods such as using artificial intelligence. However, in the past ten years, the research content was relatively scattered in China, the attention and popularity of different clusters were decreasing, and the research on the driving mechanism of biological invasion and early warning monitoring was also relatively weak. (3) In the future, relevant research within China should highlight research priorities and keep pace with international research, strengthen the research on biological invasion under the interaction of global trade, climate change and multiple driving factors, and conduct in-depth research on the comprehensive evaluation system of driving—pressure—state—response of biological invasion. Based on the systematic cognition of biological invasion research progress, it provides the theoretical support for the scientific control of biological invasion in China.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

邢文琦,陈睿山,卢俊港,郭晓娜.生物入侵研究国际进展与中国现状——基于CiteSpace的文献计量分析.生态学报,2023,43(16):6912~6922

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: