基于遥感数据的植被碳水利用效率时空变化和归因分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

西北农林科技大学博士科研启动项目(Z1090220148);国家自然科学基金项目(41977077);国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(42107512)


Spatiotemporal variation and attribution of carbon and water use efficiency in the Yellow River Basin based on remote sensing data
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Ph.D. Programs Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China,The National Natural Science Foundation of China (General Program, Key Program, Major Research Plan)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    植被碳水利用效率是表征生态系统碳水循环的重要指标。采用MODIS数据,利用Google Earth Engine平台计算植被碳利用效率(Carbon Use Efficiency,CUE)与水利用效率(Water Use Efficiency,WUE)。采用趋势分析、变异系数、R/S分析及偏相关分析等方法,对2000-2020年黄河流域植被CUE与WUE的时空动态进行分析,并探究水热条件对碳水利用效率的影响。结果表明:(1)2000-2020年黄河流域植被碳水利用效率年均值分别为0.61和0.68 gC m-2 mm-1;研究时限内,植被CUE呈波动下降趋势,而WUE呈波动上升趋势。(2)空间上,植被CUE呈西高东低分布,WUE相反。不同土地覆被类型的CUE表现为草地 > 农田 > 灌丛 > 森林;WUE表现为:农田 > 森林 > 草地 > 灌丛。(3)总体上,黄河流域植被CUE与温度呈负相关,与降水呈正相关;黄河流域北部植被WUE与温度和降水均呈正相关关系,黄河流域西南部植被WUE与降水负相关;(4)不同土地利用类型中,草地、森林、农田CUE与温度主要呈负相关响应,灌丛CUE主要呈正相关响应;黄土高原西北部地区草地CUE与降水呈正相关关系,而在黄河源区草地CUE与降水呈负相关关系,农田CUE对降水呈现正向反馈。(5)植被WUE与温度和降水的关系存在较强的空间异质性。降水是影响干旱,半干旱地区的草地WUE的主导因素,而高海拔地区草地WUE与温度、降水均呈负相关关系;灌丛WUE与温度成负相关关系,与降水呈正相关关系;受人类活动影响,农田WUE与温度有正相关关系。研究结果对于深入理解黄河流域植被恢复与气候变化双重背景下区域的植被碳水耦合机理有重要意义。

    Abstract:

    The carbon and water use efficiency of vegetation is an important indicator to characterize the carbon-water cycle. In this study, we calculated the vegetation carbon use efficiency (CUE) and water use efficiency (WUE) based on the MODIS products from the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform. The methods of trend analysis, coefficient of variation, R/S analysis, and partial correlation were used to study the spatiotemporal variations of the CUE and WUE of the Yellow River Basin from 2000 to 2020, as well as how they correlate with temperature and precipitation. The findings show that:(1) In the past 2 decades, the average annual CUE and WUE were 0.61 and 0.68 gC m-2 mm-1 in the Yellow River Basin; the vegetation CUE showed a non-significant decreasing trend, while the WUE showed a non-significant increasing trend. (2) Spatially, the vegetation CUE showed a trend of high in the west and low in the east, while WUE was the opposite. For different land cover types, the values of CUE descended in the order of grassland > cropland > shrub > forest; whereas the values of WUE descended in the order of cropland > forest > grassland > shrub. (3) Generally, the vegetation CUE of vegetation in the Yellow River Basin was negatively correlated with temperature and positively correlated with precipitation. The WUE was positively correlated with both temperature and precipitation in the northern Yellow River Basin, and it was negatively correlated with precipitation in the southwestern Yellow River Basin. (4) Among different land use types, the CUEs of grassland, forest, and cropland were mainly negatively correlated with temperature, and the CUE of shrubs was mainly positively correlated with temperature. The grassland CUE was positively correlated with precipitation in the northwest Loess Plateau, while showed a negative relationship in the source region of the Yellow River; for croplands, CUE was positively correlation with precipitation. (5) The relationships between the WUE and hydrothermal factor had strong spatial heterogeneity. Precipitation was the dominant factor affecting grassland WUE in the arid and semi-arid regions, while grassland WUE had negative correlations with both temperature and precipitation in the alpine regions; for shrubs, the WUE had negative correlations with temperature and positive correlations with precipitation; and farmland WUE had positive correlations with temperature due to the influence of human activities. The research results provide significant information for understanding the vegetation carbon-water coupling mechanism in the Yellow River Basin under the background of vegetation restoration and climate change.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

林子琦,温仲明,刘洋洋,姚宏斌,周荣磊,任涵玉,袁浏欢.基于遥感数据的植被碳水利用效率时空变化和归因分析.生态学报,2024,44(1):377~391

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: