面向生态系统评估的多源数据融合体系
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0500000);国家自然科学基金(41901358,31971575)


Advances in multi-source data fusion for ecosystem assessment
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

National Key R&D Program of China,the National Natural Science Foundation of China

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    基于生态系统服务功能的生态系统评估是识别生态环境问题、开展生态系统恢复和生物多样性保护、建立生态补偿机制的重要基础,也是保障国家生态安全、推进生态文明建设的重要环节。生态系统评估涉及生态系统多个方面,需要多要素、多类型、多尺度的生态系统观测数据作为支撑。地面观测数据和遥感数据是生态系统评估的两大数据源,但是其在使用时常存在观测标准不一、观测要素不全面、时间连续性不足、尺度不匹配等问题,给生态系统评估增加了极大的不确定性。如何融合不同尺度的观测数据量化生态系统服务功能是实现生态系统准确评估的关键。为此,从观测尺度出发,阐述了地面观测数据、近地面遥感数据、机载遥感数据和卫星遥感数据的特点及其在问题,并综述了这几类数据源进行融合的常用方法,并以生产力、固碳能力、生物多样性几个关键生态参数为例介绍了"基于多源数据融合的生态系统评估技术及其应用研究"项目的多源数据融合体系。最后,总结面向生态系统评估的多源数据融合体系,并指出了该研究的未来发展方向。

    Abstract:

    Ecosystem assessment is an important basis for ecological problems identification, ecosystem restoration, biodiversity protection, and ecological compensation. It is also a piece of decision-making information for protecting national ecological security and promoting the construction of ecological civilization. Ecosystem assessment involves multiple aspects of the ecosystem, such as carbon sequestration, soil and water conservation, biodiversity, etc. Observation data covering multiple ecosystem services and different scales is the fundamental requirement to carry out a comprehensive assessment. Field observation and remote sensing data are the major data sources for ecosystem assessment. However, there are still many problems while directly using these data in assessment, such as different observation protocols, incomplete observation elements, insufficient time continuity, and inconsistent observational scales, which would bring large uncertainty to ecosystem assessment. How to fuse these multi-sources data and accurately extract ecological parameters is the key to effective ecosystem assessment. According to the observational scale, this paper classified the observation data into four types, including ground observation data, near-surface remote sensing data, airborne remote sensing data, and spaceborne remote sensing data, then reviewed the characteristics and limitations of these multi-source data, and summarized data fusion methods between them. Ground observation data is always discrete distribution and limited coverage and is recognized as ground truth for the remote sensing data. With ecological theory, such as allometry theory or species-area relationship, ground observation data from different sources can be standardized or fused to improve the temporal or spatial coverage of ecological parameters. Near-surface and airborne remote sensing data have fine spatial resolution and large spatial coverage, which can be directly retrieved or linked with ground observation data to produce scale-matched ecological parameters which can be considered as ground truth-like data. Spaceborne remote sensing data is spatially and temporally continuous observation and is used as an important data source for ecosystem assessment. The machine learning approaches are the conventional method in the ground observation data and spaceborne remote sensing data fusion, but it is usually suffered by the spatial mismatch between ground survey and pixel size. Using near-surface and airborne remote sensing data as a medium is a new solution in ground observation data and spaceborne remote sensing data fusion which can avoid scale mismatch problems and reduce the uncertainty of ecological parameters. Moreover, this paper used several key ecological parameters as examples, such as productivity, carbon sequestration capacity, and biodiversity, to introduce the multi-source data fusion methods proposed by the National Key R&D Program of China "Ecosystem Assessment Technology and Application Research Based on Multi-source Data Fusion". Finally, we summarized multi-source data fusion methods and pointed out directions for future research.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

胡天宇,赵旦,曾源,郭庆华,何洪林.面向生态系统评估的多源数据融合体系.生态学报,2023,43(2):542~553

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: