基于景观生态学原理的生态网络构建方法比较与评价
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(41971234,41971235)


Comparison and evaluation of the ecological network construction method based on principles of landscape ecology
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    构建良好的生态网络是国土空间生态修复的重要内容,对保障区域生态安全,提高景观连通性、保护生物多样性具有重要意义。基于景观生态学原理,遵循"生态源地识别-综合阻力面构建-生态网络生成"基本模式构建区域生态网络是相关研究的主流做法。但该模式内部各环节所依赖的理论基础差异较大,相应的细化思路方法多元,考虑到尺度特征和景观的空间异质性,综合评估不同方法组合下研究结果的差异对深化原理认知和有效指导实践都具有重要意义。考虑到采用景观生态学原理构建生态网络中各环节技术方法的差异性,选取生态源地识别的4种方法、综合阻力面构建的2种方法以及生态网络生成的2种方法,分别基于最小累积阻力模型和电路理论对比两个视角,通过方法组合形成相应的生态网络并进行对比分析。研究结果表明:(1)由于原理差异,各环节下不同方法的分析结果具有显著差异,主要表现在生态源地的数量、面积和空间分布;阻力面高阻力值分布状况;以及生态廊道、生态节点的数量与格局特征等方面;(2)在基于最小累积阻力模型原理的对比方案中,构建包含Harary指数、整体连通性指数、可能连通性指数、成本比、网络密度、效能鲁棒性和廊道密度7个指标的评价体系,对该方案下的24个生态网络结果进行评价,最终基于综合评价法生成的生态源地、基于阻力系数结合夜间灯光修正因子构建的综合阻力面和基于Graphab软件生成的生态网络方法组合方式构建的生态网络最优;(3)在基于电路理论与基于最小累积阻力模型的对比方案中,基于电路理论可以识别出潜在生态廊道和用于替代最小成本路径生态廊道的结果,对基于最小累积阻力模型方法生成的结果具有较好的补充作用,将两个方法结合使用可以有效提高生态网络安全等级。

    Abstract:

    The construction of ecological network is particularly important for ensuring regionally ecological security, especially for improving landscape connectivity and protecting biodiversity. It is also a crucial content of ecological restoration of the territorial space. Currently, the basic pattern of ecological network construction based on landscape ecology has been formed. However, the methods of three core steps under this pattern, including "identification of ecological source, construction of comprehensive resistance surface, and generation of ecological network", are diversified. Considering the scale effect and the spatial heterogeneity of landscape, it is necessary to explore the applicability of different approaches through comparative evaluation. In this study, four methods of ecological source identification, two methods of comprehensive resistance surface construction and two methods of ecological network generation were selected as the research methods. Based on the two perspectives of the minimum cumulative resistance model and circuit theory, the corresponding ecological network was formed under the combination of the above methods for comparative analysis. The results showed that:(1) due to the difference of principles, the analysis results of different methods in each step were significantly different, which were mainly reflected in the number, area and spatial distribution of ecological source areas, the distribution of high resistance values on the resistance surface, and the number and pattern characteristics of ecological corridors and ecological nodes. (2) In the comparison scheme 1 based on the principle of the least cumulative resistance model, an evaluation system is constructed including Harary index, overall connectivity index IIC, possible connectivity index PC, cost ratio λ, network density D, efficiency robustness E and corridor density T. According to the comprehensive evaluation results, the optimal ecological network was constructed by the combination mode of ecological source identification based on comprehensive evaluation method, construction of comprehensive resistance surface based on resistance coefficient combined with night light correction factor and generation of ecological network by Graphab software. (3) In the second comparative scheme, the method based on the circuit theory could identify potentially ecological corridors and generate the results used to replace the minimum-cost-path type of ecological corridors, providing a good complement to the minimum cumulative resistance model. Therefore, combining the two methods can effectively improve the level of ecological network security.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李权荃,金晓斌,张晓琳,韩博,李寒冰,周寅康.基于景观生态学原理的生态网络构建方法比较与评价.生态学报,2023,43(4):1461~1473

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: