乌兰布和沙漠生态系统服务价值时空动态
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC0506701);内蒙古自治区科技重大专项(ZDZX2018054,2019ZD002);包头师范学院高层次引进人才科研启动基金项目(BTTCRCQD2018-09)


Spatiotemporal dynamics of ecosystem service value in Ulan Buh Desert
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

省、部研究计划基金

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以乌兰布和沙漠为研究区,基于1990-2018年4期土地利用类型数据,以"当量因子法"为基础,运用网格分析、热点分析、权衡协同分析等方法,探究乌兰布和沙漠近30年生态系统服务价值的时空动态特征。结果表明:(1)生态系统服务价值总量以2000年为拐点先下降后逐期上升,由1990年17.03亿元上升至2018年25.94亿元,其中调节服务价值贡献量最大,4期平均占71.34%,供给服务增幅最大,近30年间增加85.04%;(2)生态系统服务价值呈东部和东北部高、中部和西南部低的空间分布特征,1990-2010年空间格局基本不变,但2018年高值区有所扩展;(3)1990-2018年间生态系统服务冷点区面积占比由2.85%增至4.23%,热点区面积占比由0.22%增至10.45%,热点区分布在黄河沿岸及部分生态恢复区,但东南部冷点区逐渐增大,生态治理时应着重关注;(4)1990-2018年生态系统服务间以协同关系为主,权衡关系存在于初期供给服务与其他类型服务之间。

    Abstract:

    Desert ecosystem is an important subsystem of the terrestrial ecosystem, but the desert ecosystem is very fragile. Scientific research on the spatio-temporal pattern of ecosystem service value in desert regions is of great significance for the implementation of desert ecological environmental protection policies, ecological security construction and sustainable development of desert regions. This paper selected Ulan Buh Desert as the research area, collected four phases land use data of 1990-2018. Based on the equivalent factor method, the spatio-temporal dynamic characteristics of ecosystem service value in Ulan Buh desert in the past 30 years were explored by using grid analysis, hot spot analysis, trade-offs and synergies analysis, the driving factors for its formation were also discussed. The results showed that: (1) the total value of ecosystem services first decreased and then increased gradually from 17.03 billion yuan in 1990 to 25.94 billion yuan in 2018. The contribution of regulating services value was the largest among all ecosystem services, accounting for 71.34% on average, and the provisioning services increased by 85.04% in the past 30 years, which was the biggest among all ecosystem services. But the ecosystem service value was still dominated by water, desert and cultivated land, and the regional ecological security was unstable to some extent. (2) The spatial distribution of ecosystem service value was characterized by high value in the east and northeast and low value in the southwest and middle part. This was mainly related to the land use distribution in this area: to the east is the Yellow River, to the northeast is the Hetao Plain, and in the middle and southwest are deserts and saline-alkali lands. The spatial pattern was basically unchanged from 1990 to 2010, while the high-value area was expanded in 2018. (3) From 1990 to 2018, the proportion of the cold spot area increased from 2.85% to 4.23%, and the proportion of the hot spot area increased from 0.22% to 10.45%. Hot spots were distributed along the Yellow River and part of the ecological recovery areas in the northeast, but the cold spot area near the Jilantai Salt Lake increased gradually, which should be taken seriously in ecological management. (4) From 1990 to 2018, the relationship between ecosystem services was primarily synergies, and the trade-offs existed between provisioning services and other ecosystem services in 1999-2000. From 2000 to 2018, ecosystem services were all in synergies, and the degree of synergy increased with time.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

宋洁,温璐,王凤歌,李宽,吴程,张宏伟,张雪峰.乌兰布和沙漠生态系统服务价值时空动态.生态学报,2021,41(6):2201~2211

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: