枯落物输入变化对云南松林地CO2释放的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(31660146);云南省高校土壤侵蚀与控制重点实验室建设项目(云教科(2016)37号);西南林业大学博士基金项目(111705);云南省科技厅农业联合面上项目(2018FG001-050)


Effects of alteration in forest litter input on CO2 release in Pinus yunnanensis forestland in central Yunnan Plateau
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

Alterations in forest detritus inputs inuence dynamics of carbon, nitrogen and hydrologic process in a Pinus yunnanensis forest in Mopan mountain of Yunnan province, China

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为研究枯落物输入变化对云南松(Pinus yunnanensis)林地CO2释放的影响。本研究于2018年3月至2020年2月,应用枯落物添加和去除实验(DIRT),设置对照(CK)、双倍枯落物(DL)、去除枯落物(NL)、去除有机层和A层(O/A-Less)、去除根系(NR)和无输入(NI)6个处理水平,采用Li-6400便携式光合作用测量仪及TRIME-PICO 64/32土壤温度水分测定仪对不同处理样地每月的CO2通量(Rs)、土壤温度和土壤水分(15cm)进行了测定。结果表明:(1)不同处理样地CO2通量均呈现出明显的月变化,7至8月最高,1至4月最低,平均值表现为Rs (DL)=8.10 μmol m-2 s-1 > Rs (CK)=6.27 μmol m-2 s-1 > Rs (NL)=5.44 μmol m-2 s-1 > Rs (NR)=4.46 μmol m-2 s-1 > Rs (O/A-Less)=3.86 μmol m-2 s-1 > Rs (NI)=2.94 μmol m-2 s-1。(2)与CK相比,DL样地CO2通量升高了29.12%,而去除地上枯落物和地下根系样地CO2通量显著降低,CO2通量平均变幅分别为α(NR)=-28.85%,α(NI)=-53.14%,α(O/A-Less)=-38.46%,α(NL)=-13.29%。(3)不同处理土壤水分和土壤温度均存在显著的月变化(P<0.01),NL和O/A-Less的土壤水分显著低于CK,而其余处理与CK间无显著差异(P>0.05);不同处理间土壤温度表现为NR和NI均显著高于CK,其余处理与CK间无显著差异(P>0.05)。(4)不同处理样地CO2通量与土壤温度呈显著指数相关(P<0.01),与土壤水分在NI和O/A-Less处理中无显著相关(P>0.05);与CK相比,NI、O/A-Less和NL处理的Q10增加,而NR和DL处理的Q10则降低;不同处理林地CO2通量与土壤水热因子双因素模型能更好的解释林地CO2通量的变化。本研究表明枯落物不同处理通过改变土壤碳输入和土壤环境因子从而影响生态系统碳排放,研究结果可为未来气候变化和人为干扰下云南松林的碳循环提供基础数据。

    Abstract:

    In order to study the impact of aboveground/underground litter input change on the release of CO2 in Pinus yunnanensis forestland. From March 2018 to February 2020, a litter addition and removal experiment (DIRT) was carried out on the Pinus yunnanensis forest in the Mopan Mountains in central Yunnan Plateau. Treatments include normal litter input (CK), double litter (DL), removing aboveground litter (NL), removing organic layer and A layer (O/A-Less), no root inputs (NR), and removing aboveground litter and root inputs (NI). The Li-6400 portable photosynthesis meter (equipped with Li-6400-09 soil respiration chamber) and the TRIME-PICO 64/32 soil temperature and moisture meter were used to measure the monthly CO2 flux (Rs), soil temperature, and soil moisture (15 cm) of different treatment plots. The results show that: (1) the CO2 flux of the six treatment plots showed obviously monthly changes, with the highest from July to August and the lowest from January to April. The average performance was Rs(DL) > Rs(CK) > Rs(NL) > Rs(NR) > Rs(O/A-Less) > Rs(NI). (2) Compared with CK, the CO2 flux of the DL plot increased by 29.12%, while the CO2 flux of the ground litter removal and underground root plots were significantly reduced, and the average change of the CO2 flux was α(NR)=-28.85%, α(NI)=-53.14%, α(O/A-Less)=-38.46%, α(NL)=-13.29%. (3) There were significantly monthly changes in soil moisture and soil temperature in the six treatments (P<0.01). The soil moisture in NL and O/A-Less was significantly lower than that in CK, while there was no significant difference between the remaining treatments and CK. The soil temperature between different treatments showed that both NR and NI were significantly higher than CK, and there was no significant difference between the other treatments and CK (P>0.05). (4) The CO2 flux in different treatment plots was significantly exponentially correlated with soil temperature (P<0.01), but not significantly correlated with soil moisture in NI and O/A-Less treatments (P>0.05). Compared with CK (soil respiration temperature sensitivity Q10=2.39), NI, O/A-Less and NL treatments improved Q10, while NR and DL treatments reduced Q10, which were 3.86, 3.56, 2.48, 2.32, and 2.01. The two-factor model of forestland CO2 flux and soil water-heat factor under different treatments can better explain the changes of forestland CO2 flux. The change of litter input has a significant effect on the forestland CO2 flux by changing the forestland soil carbon input and soil environmental factors.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

左嫚,陈奇伯,黎建强,杨关吕,胡景,孙轲.枯落物输入变化对云南松林地CO2释放的影响.生态学报,2021,41(11):4552~4561

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: