县域生态资产核算研究——以云南省屏边县为例
作者:
基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0503402)


Assessment of Eco-assets in a county area: a case of Pingbian County
Author:
Fund Project:

2016YFC0503402

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • | |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    生态资产(Eco-Assets)是生产与提供生态产品和服务的自然资源。以国家重点生态功能区县——屏边苗族自治县为例,研究了县域生态资产核算的指标和方法,以生态资产综合指数、负债表和损益表,开展屏边县生态资产实物量核算,以期能够切实反映出生态系统实物量的变化和生态补偿成效,结合生态补偿分析屏边县生态资产变化的原因和趋势,给生态补偿政策和离任干部审计提供技术支撑。结果表明:(1)屏边县生态资产核算可以分为森林、灌丛、草地、湿地自然生态系统和农田、城镇和荒漠人工生态系统实物量的核算。(2)2015年,屏边县生态资产指数为1.09,森林和灌丛占据主要位置,二者总和占当年生态资产的95.48%。15年来,屏边县生态资产综合指数降低了16.48%,其中森林和草地降低明显,分别减少了20.10%和6.67%,湿地指数增长了57.11%。(3)2000年以来,生态保护工程和城镇扩张是生态资产变化的主要原因,生态补偿投入持续增加为生态保护工程顺利建设实施提供了保障。本研究表明,现有的土地利用数据和生态环境监测数据基本可以支撑县域生态资产的核算,同时县域生态资产的变化能够体现出生态保护工程实行成效,并为实行领导干部自然资源资产离任审计提供重要依据,为生态补偿政策提供科学支撑。

    Abstract:

    Construction of county ecological civilization is the key topic of the 18th National Congress, the 1st Session of the 13th National People's Congress to enshrine "ecological civilization" in the Constitution. Establishing reasonable ecological compensation policy and audit on the departure of the governmental officials is a fundamental problem in the construction of county ecological civilization. Eco-Assets is a natural resource for the production and provision of ecological products and services. The ecological asset accounting can effectively reflect the change of physical quantity and the effect of ecological compensation in ecosystems. This study took Miao Autonomous County of Pingbian as an example, which is National Key ecological Function area. We built an accounting index system and method for the county's Eco-Assets, carried out Pingbian County's Eco-Assets accounting, and combined ecological compensation to analyze the county Eco-Assets changes. The results showed that: (1) Pingbian County Eco-Assets accounting could be divided into 4 kinds of ecosystem accounting including forests, shrub, grasslands, and wetlands. (2) In 2015, Pingbian County Eco-Assets Index was 1.09. Forests and shrubs occupied the main position, which accounted for 95.48% of the Eco-Assets of the year. Since 2000, the Pingbian County Composite index of Eco-Assets decreased by 16.48%, with forest and grassland decreasing significantly by 20.1% and 12.45%. (3) Since 2000, ecological protection project and urban expansion have been the main reasons for the change of Eco-Assets, and the continuous increase of ecological compensation investment has provided a good environment for the smooth construction and implementation of ecological protection project. The study showed that the land use data and the existing environmental monitoring data could basically support the accounting of a county's Eco-Assets. In addition, the change of Eco-Assets in county area could reflect the effectiveness of ecological protection project. It not only provides an important basis for the implementation of audit on the departure of natural resources assets, but also provides scientific support for the ecological compensation policy.

    参考文献
    [1] 欧阳志云, 郑华, 谢高地, 杨武, 刘桂环, 石英华, 杨多贵. 生态资产、生态补偿及生态文明科技贡献核算理论与技术. 生态学报, 2016, 36(22):7136-7139.
    [2] Ouyang Z Y, Zheng H, Xiao Y, Polasky S, Liu J G, Xu W H, Wang Q, Zhang L, Xiao Y, Rao E M, Jiang L, Lu F, Wang X K, Yang G B, Gong S H, Wu B F, Zeng Y, Yang W, Daily G C. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science, 2016, 352(6292):1455-1459.
    [3] 谢高地. 生态资产评价:存量、质量与价值. 环境保护, 2017, 45(11):18-22.
    [4] Holdren J P, Ehrlich P R. Human population and the global environment. American Scientist, 1974, 62(3):282-292.
    [5] Westman W E. How much are nature's services worth? Science, 1977, 197(4307):960-964.
    [6] Costanza R, d'Arge R, De Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill R V, Paruelo J, Raskin R G, Sutton P, Van Den Belt M. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387(6630):253-260.
    [7] Daily G C. Nature's Services:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC:Island Press, 1997:220-221.
    [8] United Nations. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012:Experimental Ecosystem Accounting——. New York:United Nations, 2014.
    [9] 欧阳志云, 靳乐山. 面向生态补偿的生态系统生产总值(GEP)和生态资产核算. 北京:科学出版社, 2017:12-13.
    [10] 中共中央国务院. 生态文明体制改革总体方案. (2015-09-21). http://www.gov.cn/guowuyuan/2015-09/21/content_2936327.htm.
    [11] 中共中央国务院. 中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定. (2013-11-12). http://www.qstheory.cn/zxdk/2013/201322/201311/t20131118_292450.htm.
    [12] 高吉喜, 范小杉. 生态资产概念、特点与研究趋向. 环境科学研究, 2007, 20(5):137-143.
    [13] 刘焱序, 傅伯杰, 赵文武, 王帅. 生态资产核算与生态系统服务评估:概念交汇与重点方向. 生态学报, 2018, 38(23):8267-8276.
    [14] 王娟娟, 万大娟, 彭晓春, 洪鸿加, 杨霞, 刘培亮. 关于生态资产核算方法探讨. 环境与可持续发展, 2014, 39(6):14-18.
    [15] 屏边苗族自治县地方志编纂委员会办公室. 屏边年鉴2016. 德宏:德宏民族出版社, 2016.
    [16] 蔡春, 毕铭悦. 关于自然资源资产离任审计的理论思考. 审计研究, 2014, (5):3-9.
    [17] 国家发展改革委. 关于同意内蒙古乌兰察布市等13个市和重庆巫山县等74个县开展生态文明示范工程试点的批复. (2012-04-01)[2019-07-10]. http://zfxxgk.ndrc.gov.cn/web/iteminfo.jsp?id=1398.
    [18] 肖洋, 欧阳志云, 王莉雁, 饶恩明, 江凌, 张路. 内蒙古生态系统质量空间特征及其驱动力. 生态学报, 2016, 36(19):6019-6030.
    [19] 宋昌素, 肖燚, 博文静, 肖洋, 邹梓颖, 欧阳志云. 生态资产评价方法研究——以青海省为例. 生态学报, 2019, 39(1):9-23.
    [20] 杨光梅, 闵庆文, 李文华, 甄霖. 我国生态补偿研究中的科学问题. 生态学报, 2007, 27(10):4289-4300.
    [21] 黄喆. 论跨界污染治理中的生态补偿及其制度完善. 政法学刊, 2016, 33(6):20-25.
    [22] 新华网. 习近平生态文明思想引领"美丽中国"建设. (2018-05-22)[2019-07-10]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/xxjxs/2018-05/22/c_1122866707.htm.
    [23] 虞慧怡, 许志华, 曾贤刚. 生态补偿绩效及其影响因素研究进展. 生态经济, 2016, 32(8):170-174.
    [24] 张辉. 我国林业生态补偿的绩效评价[D]. 杭州:浙江理工大学, 2016.
    相似文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

游旭,何东进,肖燚,博文静,宋昌素,欧阳志云.县域生态资产核算研究——以云南省屏边县为例.生态学报,2020,40(15):5220~5229

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: