Abstract:Equilibrium factors and yield factors are important parameters in ecological footprint model. The existing researches on the parameters of ecological footprint model were mostly aimed at large scale areas on the basis of material production and consumption. The material evaluation can't meet the requirements of ecological carrying capacity evaluation with the construction of ecological civilization. This article proposed the concept and model of equilibrium factors and yield factors based on ecosystem services value. We took Mentougou district of Beijing as an example in 1990, 2005 and 2015 to study the ecological carrying capacity and ecological footprint of forest, cultivated land, and water area in ecological conservation development area. The results are compared with the general factor ecological footprint model. The results showed that (1) the equilibrium factors based on ecosystem service value was water > forest > cultivated land. The equilibrium factor of water was much higher than that of other ecosystems with average 8.37. The equilibrium factor of the cultivated land was the lowest, and its average was 0.24. The equilibrium factor of forest was higher than that of the cultivated land value, and its average was 0.71. The results showed the difference of ecosystem services' capacity of different ecosystems. (2) The yield factors of different ecosystems were close to each other, but they decreased year by year. The average yield factor of forest, the cultivated land, and water area were 0.87, 0.90 and 0.86, respectively. It showed that the ecosystem services provided by Mentougou ecosystem failed to reach the national average level. (3) From 1990 to 2015, the ecological carrying capacity of Mentougou district decreased firstly and then increased. The ecological footprint increased at first and then decreased. The ecological deficit was found in the study area in 2005. The ecosystem service carrying capacity of the forest land firstly decreased and then increased, and it had decisive effect on the ecological carrying capacity due to the advantages of forest resources in Mentougou district. The ecological carrying capacity and ecological footprint obtained by ecosystem service value were smaller than the results of the generic factor ecological footprint model except the water area. The equilibrium factors and yield factors based on ecosystem service value can well reflect the changes of ecological carrying capacity and ecological footprint in the study area compared with the traditional ecological footprint model.