阔叶红松林下6种早夏草本不同生长期生物量分配及模型构建
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家"十二五"科技支撑项目(2012BAC01B03);林业公益性科研行业专项(200904022)。


Biomass allocation and biomass allometric models of six early-summer herbs under the canopy of broad-leaved Korean pine forest during different growth periods in Jiaohe, Jilin Province
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    早夏草本植物作为阔叶红松林林下的一类优势物种,对整个生长季林下草本物种多样性和生物量具有重要影响,对其不同生长阶段生物量分配特征及生物量模型的研究有助于了解该类植物生存策略和碳汇储量。以吉林省蛟河地区阔叶红松林林下的白花碎米荠(Cardamine leucantha)、北重楼(Paris verticillata)、鹿药(Smilacina japonica)、美汉草(Meehania fargesii)、山茄子(Anisodus acutangulus)和紫花变豆菜(Sanicula rubriflora)6种早夏草本植物为研究对象,从4月初到8月底对其物候期进行观察记录,定期取样,从而对6种植物不同生长时期各组分生物量分配特征,地上与地下生物量相对生长关系进行分析研究,并以株高级为自变量建立5种形式(一元线性模型、一元二次模型、指数模型、幂函数模型、对数模型)的单种和混种生物量模型,选取最优模型进行验证。结果表明,6种早夏草本植物花期一般开始于4月底结束于6月中旬,果期开始于5月底结束于8月中旬,不同植物的花、果期持续时间差异较大。生长期内,随着植物生长,株高、生物量和根冠比(R/S)变化明显,但变化趋势不一致。不同物种各组分生物量分配存在差异,用于繁殖的生物量分配比例较小,通常不超过5%。所有物种AGB和BGB间均具有明显的相对生长关系(P < 0.0001),且均表现为异速生长(相关生长指数a≠1)。根据R2和SEE选取最优生物量模型,其中幂函数模型形式最常用,其次是一元二次和指数模型。所有最优模型的R2均较高且SEE较低,拟合效果较好,其中AGB和TB的最优模型要优于BGB,单种模型优于混种模型;通过验证,除混合模型BGB的RMA(30.679%)稍大于30%外,所有模型的RSEE和RMA均小于30%,P值均大于80%,说明所建立的最优模型能够用来对该地区阔叶红松林林下早夏草本植物生物量进行估算。

    Abstract:

    As the one kind of dominant component under broad-leaves Korean pine forest stands, the early-summer herbs have an important influence on herb layer species diversity and biomass in the whole growth periods. Studying on the biomass allocation structure and biomass allometric model in different growth stages will further help to understand the survival strategy and carbon storage of these species. Cardamine leucantha, Paris verticillata, Smilacina japonica, Meehania fargesii, Anisodus acutangulus and Sanicula rubriflora were selected for phenological observation and periodical sampling from the beginning of April to the end of August. Biomass allocation characteristics and the relationships between above-ground biomass (AGB) and below-ground biomass (BGB) in different growth stages for the six early-summer herbs were analyzed. With height classes as the independent variable, the single-species and mix-species allometric models were established with five model forms (linear regression of one-variable, quadratic model, exponential model, power model, and logarithmic model). Then the optimization models were chosen and validated. The result shows that the florescence generally began in late April and ended in mid June, and the fruit period began in late May and ended in mid August for the six herbs. The duration of flower and fruit period was different in different species. The plant height, biomass and root shoot ratio (R/S) were significant various with plant growth in the whole growth periods, but the changing tendency was different. The allocation proportion of components in different species was different and the proportion of biomass allocation for reproduction was usually less than 5%. The relationships between above- and below-ground biomass were both allometric relationship (the P-value less than 0.0001 and the allometric exponent a≠1). The power model was the most frequently chosen as the optimization model base on the R2 (coefficient of determination) and SEE (standard error of estimate), followed by quadratic model and exponential model. The higher R2 value and lower SEE value of all optimization models indicate that the model was the better usability. And the models about AGB and TB were better than BGB, the single-species models were better than the mix-species ones. The RS, EE and RMA value of all optimization models were less than 30% excepting the model of mix-species model about BGB (RMA=30.679%) and the P-value were more than 80% by data verification. We conclude that these optimization models were able to calculate biomass of early-summer herbs under canopy of broad-leaves Korean pine in this region.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

孙越,何怀江,李良,宋彩民,王峰洁,夏富才.阔叶红松林下6种早夏草本不同生长期生物量分配及模型构建.生态学报,2017,37(19):6523~6533

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: