Living Planet Report 2014 was issued in September 2014 by World Wide Fund for Nature, Zoological Society of London, Global Footprint Network and Water Footprint Network. The indicator of “planetary boundaries” is analyzed that we are in danger of crashing Earth’s life-support systems besides living planet index (LPI), ecological footprint and water footprint. The latest data available (for 2010) indicate that the LPI has declined by 52 per cent since 1970. The temperate LPI declined by 36 per cent, and the tropical LPI shows a 56 per cent reduction over the same period. The terrestrial LPI and marine LPI had declined by 39 per cent, and the LPI for freshwater species shows an average decline of 76 per cent between 1970 and 2010. In 1961, global ecological footprint was 7.6 billion global hectare (gha), earth’s total biocapacity 9.9 billion gha, and ecological reserve 2.3 billion gha. In 2010, global ecological footprint was 18.1 billion gha, earth’s total biocapacity 12 billion gha, ecological deficit 6.1 billion gha. In 1961, carbon was 36% of our total Footprint, but by 2010, it comprised 53%. The 5 largest water footprints of production for the countries in the world are India, USA, China, Brazil and Russia. Stress on blue water resources is calculated on a monthly basis with more than 200 river basins, home to some 2.67 billion people, already experiencing severe water scarcity for at least one month every year. The nine identified boundaries are climate change, ocean acidification, biodiversity loss, interference with the global nitrogen and phosphorus cycles, ozone depletion, global fresh water use, land system change, atmospheric aerosol loading, and chemical pollution. We have already overstepped three (biodiversity loss, climate change, and the nitrogen cycle) of the nine planetary boundaries. The LPI of high-income countries appear to show an increase, middle-income and low-income countries show marked decline. They may reflect the way these countries import resources-effectively outsourcing biodiversity loss and its impacts to lower-income countries. High-income countries often rely on the biocapacity of other nations or the global commons to meet their consumption demands. The high human development in developed countries has been achieved at the expense of a high ecological footprint. Low-income countries should to significantly increase their IHDI without significantly increasing their ecological footprint and for countries with high IHDI to reduce their footprints. Five topics can be concluded based on the Living Planet Report 2014.There are rapid species loss, severe ecological overshoot, crossed planetary boundaries, unfair regional consumption, and one planet living.