大气颗粒物(PM2.5、PM10)对地表景观结构的响应研究进展
作者:
作者单位:

南京师范大学地理科学学院;南通大学地理科学学院,南京师范大学地理科学学院,南京师范大学地理科学学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(31570459,41401205);江苏省自然科学基金项目(BK20140921);江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心;江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(164320H116)


Research on the response of air particles (PM2.5、PM10) to landscape structure: A review
Author:
Affiliation:

Collage of Geography Science,Nanjing Normal University;School of Geography Sciences,Nantong university,Collage of Geography Science,Nanjing Normal University,Collage of Geography Science,Nanjing Normal University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    颗粒物PM2.5、PM10是近年来我国大气首要污染物,威胁环境和人类健康。地表景观结构直接或间接影响PM2.5、PM10浓度,了解其影响过程和机理对于改善生态环境具有重要意义。系统总结了国内外关于PM2.5、PM10对地表景观结构响应的研究成果,指出研究中出现不确定性的可能影响因素,并对今后的发展方向进行展望。得出基本结论:①地表景观类型的构成及其格局显著影响大气颗粒物浓度,对PM2.5、PM10起到“源”和“汇”的作用。②地表景观结构引起局地气候变化并影响颗粒物的迁移转化,但其影响过程和机理复杂,研究结论并不明确。③颗粒物浓度和地表景观数据主要通过实际监测或遥感处理方法获得,但因为获取方法、监测点微观环境及遥感影像等因素影响,导致数据具有不确定性,加上时空尺度相对应的复杂性,大大限制了地表景观结构与PM2.5、PM10响应关系的研究进展,是未来要突破的难点。④PM2.5、PM10对地表景观结构响应的区域时空差异及过程,局地小气候变化对颗粒物浓度的影响过程和强度,主要景观类型尤其是水体、湿地景观对大气颗粒物浓度的影响过程、机理与贡献程度等是未来需要关注的方向。

    Abstract:

    In recent years, high concentrations of inhalable particulate matter (PM10) or fine particulate matter (PM2.5), primary pollutants in most cities, have been monitored frequently in China. Numerous studies have manifested an inextricably link between atmospheric particulate matter and human health. The ambient PM2.5 or PM10 concentrations are affected by the landscape structure (LS, including the landscape composition and configuration) directly or indirectly. Consequently, quantifying the connectivity of PM2.5,PM10 concentrations in LS has become an important subject in the scientific and decision-making communities. Based on the systematic summary of both domestic and foreign studies, a series of possible influential factors attributed to the uncertainty in this field of study were identified, and potential study directions for the future have been proposed. Firstly, results indicate that the type of landscape has different effects on the concentrations of air particles. Urban sprawl aggravates air pollution, and densely built-up city areas have turned into the critical situations suffering from high concentrations of air pollutant (particularly PM2.5,PM10). Intra-urban landscapes, construction areas, areas of heavy traffic and industrial zones, leading to higher PM2.5 or PM10 concentrations through direct discharge of particles, were considered to be the "source" landscapes. Because of effective role of plants in interception and absorption of particles, the concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 in woodland, grassland and green-land were lower than other types of landscape, and these were usually deemed as the "sink" landscapes. Due to the variation of seasonal impacts of air particles, farmland was often regarded as the "source" in the harvest season and the "sink" in the growing season. It is still indeterminate whether the wetland is the "source" or the "sink", as well as a water body. Secondly, the characteristic modification of the surface land during urbanization has exerted strong impacts on the meteorological conditions, which may influence the process of air contamination. The microclimate changes caused by LS, such as urban heat islands or cold-humid ecological effects, affect the evolution of airborne contaminants indirectly. However,these influences, processes, and mechanisms were too intricate to determine accordant conclusions from previous literature. Our third finding examines data in existing research of PM2.5 or PM10 concentrations and landscape pattern were mostly obtained through monitoring or remote sensing retrieval. But these data were still uncertain due to the effects of method, micro-environment and image. The spatial-temporal scale between air particles and LS was also complicated. All mentioned above have greatly lagged the research progress of relationship between LS and the responses of air particulate matter, and would be new challenges for prospective studies. Fourth, some key study directions should be highlighted in future, such as analyses on the regional spatial-temporal differential and the response course of PM2.5 or PM10 to LS. Besides, the influence processes, mechanism and contribution degree of air particles concentration caused by LS and its climate change, especially by water body, wetland and their cold-humid ecological effects were also in need of concerns in the future.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

娄彩荣,刘红玉,李玉玲,李玉凤.大气颗粒物(PM2.5、PM10)对地表景观结构的响应研究进展.生态学报,2016,36(21):6719~6729

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: