Abstract:The Yellow River irrigation of Ningxia is an important irrigation area in North China, and is a region with severe nitrate leaching and water pollution. Water quality in many drainage ditches is classified as Inferior Category V, and the main pollutants are nitrate and ammonium. The concentration of ammonium is generally 20-30 mg/L and the maximum concentration can reach 70 mg/L; therefore, quality of downstream water can be markedly affected. The contribution of field total nitrogen and ammonia nitrogen are up to 61%-66% and 76%-81%, respectively. The concentration of nitrate is more than 10 mg/L in half of all shallow groundwater. The content of soil organic matter is low in this area, which ranges from 9.2 to 14.5 g/kg with an average level of 10.2 g/kg. This may cause nitrate to be easily lost from the soil. In order to control the leaching of soil nitrate nitrogen in the Yellow River irrigation area, we intended to restore soil organic matter through the straw-returning method. In a case study conducted in the Yellow River irrigation of the Ningxia area, the patterns of nitrate leaching were studied in soil using the rice straw-returning. The field experiment contained three treatments including tradition fertilization without rice straw (CK), tradition fertilization combined with rice straw of 4500 kg/hm2(T1, half straw application), and traditional fertilization combined with rice straw of 9000 kg/hm2(T2, total straw application). Nitrate nitrogen leaching loss in soil layers 10, 20, 30, 60, and 90 cm deep was measured by the resin core method. We found that nitrate leaching losses with and without treatments ranged from 6.26 to 12.85 kg/hm2 (pure nitrogen), representing 2.78%-5.71% of fertilizer nitrogen. Compared to CK, the nitrate leaching loss at 10 cm depth in T1 and T2 had a 0.09% decrease and 3.97% decrease, respectively; at 20 cm depth, T1 and T2 decreased the loss by 8.51% and 9.81%; at 30 cm depth, the reduction of nitrate leaching loss reached to 2.25% (T1) and 10.34% (T2); at 60 cm depth. Such decreases were 23.85% (T1) and 13.08% (T2); at 90 cm depth, T1 and T2 further reduced 27.65% and 20.73% loss, respectively. T1, T2, and CK were not significantly different in nitrate leaching loss at 10 and 20 cm depth (P<0.05). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between T1 and CK or between T1 and T2. However, T2 led to significant improvement at 30 cm depth, indicating that total straw application was an effective way to prevent nitrate leaching loss in the irrigation area. Nitrate nitrogen leaching losses among T1, T2, and CK at 60 cm depth were significantly different. Both treatments showed significant alleviation for nitrate leaching loss compared with CK at 90 cm depth, although there was no significant difference between these two methods. The critical period of nitrate nitrogen leaching loss began from spring to the early filling stage, because nitrate nitrogen leaching loss during this time was 52.95%-67.79% of the total. The yield increase of winter wheat in T1 and T2 fields was 10.11% and 11.51%, respectively. Taken together, these data suggest that the rice straw returning method is effective at reducing the nitrate nitrogen leaching loss at deep soil layers in the Yellow River irrigation of Ningxia area.