寄主植物轮换饲养和次生代谢物交叉涂布对棉铃虫取食的影响
作者:
作者单位:

河南农业大学植物保护学院 郑州 450002,河南农业大学植物保护学院 郑州 450002,河南农业大学植物保护学院 郑州 450002,河南农业大学植物保护学院 郑州 450002,河南农业大学植物保护学院 郑州 450002,河南农业大学植物保护学院 郑州 450002

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

Q968.1

基金项目:

国家公益性行业(农业)专项资助项目(201203036); 河南省教育厅自然科学研究基础项目(12A210012)


Effects of host-switching and cross-coating with host secondary metabolite on Helicoverpa armigera larvae feeding
Author:
Affiliation:

College of Plant Protection,Henan Agricultural University,College of Plant Protection,Henan Agricultural University,College of Plant Protection,Henan Agricultural University,College of Plant Protection,Henan Agricultural University,College of Plant Protection,Henan Agricultural University,College of Plant Protection,Henan Agricultural University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    食物混合通常对多食性昆虫的生长表现有积极的影响,然而此前的研究对象主要是成虫期和幼虫期迁移能力较强的种类.某些鳞翅目种类尽管是多食性的,但其幼虫个体因时空隔离的原因,并无机会自由选择食料寄主.采用寄主叶片轮换饲养和次生代谢物交叉涂布两种方法研究了多食性棉铃虫幼虫的取食行为,供试寄主植物包括烟草、辣椒、番茄和棉花,次生代谢物采用自然浓度进行交叉涂布.结果表明,食物混合并没有造成幼虫总体摄食量的显著增加.其中,烟草和水合烟碱能显著抑制棉铃虫对其他寄主叶碟的取食,而辣椒及(E)-辣椒素对其他寄主叶碟的被食量均无影响.番茄叶片轮换饲养不影响棉铃虫对与其轮换的其他寄主叶片的被食量,但α-番茄苷涂布在辣椒和棉花叶碟上则对棉铃虫有显著拒食作用.棉花-烟草轮换饲养组中的烟草被食量显著大于烟草非轮换组中的烟草被食量,但(+)-棉酚涂布处理却能显著抑制棉铃虫对烟草的摄食.两种生物测定方法均未发现棉花与辣椒存在显著性相互影响.总之,棉铃虫可能是以耐受式的对策适应寄主植物次生代谢物的,符合相称性形态构成假说,即扩散能力较差的鳞翅目幼虫个体并不需要进化出同时应对来自两种或两种以上的寄主植物次生代谢物的适应机制.

    Abstract:

    Dietary mixing, which means that polyphagous animals prefer to switch the diet items during ontogeny, often affects their growth and developmental performance positively. Two hypotheses, known as nutritional compensation and toxin dilution effect, have been put forward to explain such positive effect based upon the observations of various grasshopper species. As have been demonstrated in many Lepidopterous species, however, polyphagy at the species or population levels do not necessarily imply polyphagy at the individual level, for a caterpillar often has no chance to choose among host plant species due to temporal and spatial separation. In this paper, the authors reported the larvae feeding behavior of a typical generalist species, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner), by means of forced host-switching (at two hour interval) and cross-coating of secondary metabolites (at natural concentrations) from four common host plant species of H. armigera larvae: tobacco, hot pepper, tomato, and cotton. The results show that, in all the cases, the dietary-mixing did not significantly increase the overall leaf consumption of the fourth instar larvae, moreover, some combinations inhibited feeding amounts and others had no effect, suggesting that nutritional compensation hypothesis could not explain the dietary mixing behavior of H. armigera larvae. Both tobacco leaf and its major secondary metabolite, nicotine hydrate, significantly inhibited the leaf consumption of all the other host species, while neither hot pepper leaf nor its secondary metabolite, (E)-capsaicin, showed effect on feeding amounts of all the other host species. Although tomato leaf in dietary-switching groups did not affect the consumptions of all the other three host leaves, α-tomatine showed significant feeding deterrence when coated on the leaf of hot pepper or cotton. The consumption of tobacco leaf discs increased in cotton-tobacco switching group compared with that in tobacco non-switching group, but the coating of (+)-gossypol on tobacco leaf discs decreased the feeding amounts. Cotton and hot pepper leaf showed no significant interactive effect, neither in force-switching bioassay nor in cross-coating bioassay. Taken together, H. armigera larvae may cope with the secondary metabolites contained in their natural host plants by tolerance strategy, and the tolerance level of an individual larva is in accordance with the symmorphosis hypothesis, i.e. a certain individual larva does not necessarily evolve the mechanisms to adapt multiple secondary metabolites which derived from all the recorded host species.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李慧玲,原国辉,胡晶晶,李洋洋,郭线茹,李为争.寄主植物轮换饲养和次生代谢物交叉涂布对棉铃虫取食的影响.生态学报,2014,34(24):7421~7427

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: