基于效益分摊的水电水足迹计算方法——以密云水库为例
作者:
作者单位:

北京林业大学自然保护区学院,北京 10083,北京林业大学自然保护区学院,北京 10083,北京林业大学自然保护区学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家国际科技合作专项资助(2012DFA91530);国家自然科学基金项目(41161140353,91025009,51009005);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(TD-JC-2013-2)


A new approach to assess the water footprint of hydropower:a case study of the Miyun reservoir in China
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Nature Conservation,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing,100083,School of Nature Conservation,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing,100083,

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    随着中国经济的飞速发展,可再生能源的开发利用已经被提到重要的议事日程,其中水力发电是重中之重。但水力发电过程也消耗大量的水资源,使得水电水足迹的核算成为当前水足迹研究热点。多功能水库同时具有发电、供水、防洪、旅游、水产等多种生态系统服务功能。传统水足迹核算方法往往将水库的水足迹等同于水电水足迹,忽略了水库的多功能性,因而高估了水电的水足迹。对传统水电水足迹的核算方法进行了改进,考虑到水库不同的生态系统服务功能,加入了水电效益分摊系数这一指标,将水电水足迹从水库水足迹中分离出来。以华北最大水库北京密云水库为例,采用传统的方法和改进的方法计算了密云水库1988-2004年水电水足迹。研究结果显示:倘若不考虑效益分摊,按照传统的方法,密云水库1988-2004年平均水电水足迹为897 m3/GJ;按照效益分摊的方法计算得到的平均水电水足迹为127 m3/GJ,仅为不考虑效益分摊情况下计算的水电水足迹的14%。水力发电是密云水库初期建设的主要目的,但自1998年之后发电量逐年减少,近年来基本不发电。传统方法下的2004年单位水电水足迹为4529.5 m3/GJ,为单位水电水足迹最大的年份;但应用改进方法后该年的单位水电水足迹仅为67.3 m3/GJ,反而成为单位水电水足迹最大的年份。考虑效益分摊更能够体现水电水足迹的真实情况,为多功能水库水电水足迹核算提供了新的思路和方法。

    Abstract:

    Globally, freshwater is a limited resource for human development. Social and economic development must consider water resources for sustainable development. With China's rapid economic development, renewable energy has been pushed to the forefront of the development agenda, and hydroelectricity is the most important renewable energy.However, hydroelectricity also consumes a lot of water, hence, it is important to assess the impact of hydroelectricity on the environment and water resources, so many researchers have focused their attention on calculation of the water footprint. This is an indicator of the amount of water used to produce goods and services.It provides a reasonable and broad perspective for consumers and producers to help understand their relationship with freshwater systems. The water footprint concept help spolicymakers and stakeholders to enact more rational policies for water resources management. According to the available global literature, there are three main methods used to calculate the water footprint of hydroelectricity: Gross water consumption, Net water consumption and Water balance. The dominant calculation method uses the gross evaporation from freshwater reservoirs divided by the annual power production. In previous studies, the water consumption from a reservoir is often completely attributed to hydroelectricity, but this apparently overestimates the water footprint (WF) of hydroelectricity, especially for reservoirs with multiple functions. The multi-function reservoir provides many ecosystem services, such as water supply,irrigation, flood control,and fishery,so the traditional water footprint counting method will produce doubling counting. We used a new approach, the cost allocation method, to quantify the water footprint of hydroelectricity (WFh) by separating it from the reservoir footprint using an allocation coefficient (η) based on the ratio of hydropower income to the total economic benefit of the reservoir. Such an approach was used to study data from 1988 to 2004 for the case area of the Miyun reservoir, a multi-function reservoir,and the largest reservoir in the North China plain.More than 60% of the economic benefit was from flood control and water supply, and less than 40% of the economic value was from irrigation, electricity and fishery. The results show that,from 1988 to 2004,the average product water footprint of hydroelectricity(PWFh)in the Miyun reservoir was 897 m3/GJ,according to the traditional calculation method.However,based on the improved method, the average PWFh was only 127 m3/GJ,just 14% of the traditional method.Initially, the primary purpose of the Miyun reservoir was for hydroelectric generation, but since 1998, the amount of electricity generated has decreased. Using the traditional calculation method, the PWFh in 2004 was 4529.5 m3/GJ, the largest amount for all the years considered, yet, according to the improved cost allocation method, the PWFh was 67.3 m3/GJ, the smallest among all the years considered. It is easy to obtain data using the cost allocation method and it has good operability.Application of the improved method will be propitious in the assessment of the market value of economic benefits. The allocation coefficient(η)combines the environmental indicator with the economic indicator, and the approach based on the allocation coefficient is more objective and accurate for the assessment of WFh. The cost allocation method will further the application of the water footprint in hydroelectric power generation. Most reservoirs have a varying surface area over time, as a result of changes in water volume during the year and between years, thus, it is necessary to maintain temporal and spatial consistency when collecting economic data. Hydropower has long been considered a clean, renewable energy and has been actively promoted in many countries. This study indicates that the WF of hydropower should be integrated into the environmental impact assessment system for a more comprehensive understanding of hydropower projects in future. The cost allocation method can assess the influence of hydroelectricity in one reservoir andwill provide the basis for water price.It will also foster new ideas about how to accurately calculate the water footprint of hydroelectricity.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

赵丹丹,刘俊国,赵旭.基于效益分摊的水电水足迹计算方法——以密云水库为例.生态学报,2014,34(10):2787~2795

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: