基于GIS和RUSLE模型道路对土壤侵蚀格局的影响研究——以浙江省杭金衢高速诸暨段为例
作者:
作者单位:

浙江大学生命科学学院生态研究所,浙江大学生命科学学院生态研究所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S157.1; Q149

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(40671117,40771117);国家863项目(2007AA10Z220);农业部面源污染控制重点开放实验室资助项目(KYJD09021)


Impact of road on soil erosion risk pattern based on RUSLE and GIS:a case study of Hangjinqu highway, Zhuji section
Author:
Affiliation:

Institute of Ecological Planning and Landscape Design,College of Life Science,Zhejiang University,Institute of Ecological Planning and Landscape Design,College of Life Science,Zhejiang University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以浙江省诸暨市为研究区域,以杭金衢高速公路诸暨段为研究对象,以研究区的DEM、降雨、土壤类型、遥感图、道路图等数据为基础,运用GIS和RUSLE模型分析了该公路建设前后诸暨市的土壤侵蚀风险分布格局。此外,采用缓冲区分析的方法,对比高速公路周围的土壤侵蚀风险等级的变化情况,以此分析在高速公路影响域内土壤侵蚀等级分布规律,并进一步探求高速公路对土壤侵蚀的影响范围,在此基础上提出具有针对性的土壤侵蚀防治措施。其主要结果如下:(1)根据RUSLE模型计算获得诸暨市土壤侵蚀模数A的取值,1999年诸暨市的土壤侵蚀量模数在0-380.02 t hm-2 a-1之间;2003年诸暨市的土壤侵蚀量模数在0-572.94 t hm-2 a-1之间,2003年诸暨市的土壤侵蚀量以及土壤侵蚀风险等级均高于1999年。(2)通过缓冲区分析,年际间变化表明高速公路建设增加了土壤侵蚀量,加剧了高速公路附近的土壤侵蚀风险,极强度侵蚀和剧烈侵蚀等级的响应最强烈,而高速公路单侧660m的范围则是剧烈侵蚀的影响范围,以此视为防治重点区域。(3)通过成因分析可知,由公路建设导致的景观破碎化加剧和建设用地比例增加是引起剧烈侵蚀增加的重要原因,因此高速公路的水土保持需要重点从这两方面入手,采取相应措施。

    Abstract:

    This study adopted GIS and Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) methods to analyze the risk pattern of soil erosion in the affected road zone of Hangjinqu highway in Zhuji City, Zhejiang Province. Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data, rainfall records, soil type data, remote sensing imaging, and a road map of Hangjinqu highway were used for these GIS and RUSLE analyses. Additionally, the soil erosion situations before and after the construction of this highway were compared by using buffer analysis, which was done by setting a series of buffer gradients and calculating the soil erosion patterns of these buffer gradients. According to the change of these soil erosion patterns within the buffer gradient, the effective distance of highway was also determined, and some prevention suggestions were given accordingly. This study came to the following four conclusions: (1)The estimated average soil loss A (t hm-2 a-1), according to the RUSLE results, was 0-380.02 t hm-2 a-1 before highway construction and was 0-572.94 t hm-2 a-1 after highway construction, demonstrating that soil erosion and soil erosion risk levels were all higher following completion of the highway construction;(2) The results of the buffer analysis indicated that highway construction was the main reason for the increase in soil erosionalong the affected area of highway, and the severe grade of erosion change was most dramatic. The degree of soil erosion changed especially dramatically within 660 meters of the highway, so this area should be identified as the key area in which necessary soil and water conservation measures should be taken to prevent soil erosion; (3) The soil erosion was significantly correlated with the degree of landscape fragmentation and the proportion of build-up area, as shown through cause analysis. Therefore, the increases in the degree of landscape fragmentation and the proportion of build-up area were important contributors to severe grade erosion.These two aspects merit particular focus, and necessary measures should be taken in order to protect soil and water conservation beside the highway. Such measures might include choosing special plant species which can help to prevent soil erosion,changing planting patterns,and increasing the vegetation coverage, which can be done through crop rotation and intercropping methods.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

乌玲瑛,严力蛟.基于GIS和RUSLE模型道路对土壤侵蚀格局的影响研究——以浙江省杭金衢高速诸暨段为例.生态学报,2014,34(19):5659~5669

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: