丽江市家庭能耗碳排放特征及影响因素
作者:
作者单位:

中国科学院城市环境研究所,中国科学院生态环境研究中心 北京,中国科学院城市环境研究所,中国科学院生态环境研究中心

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

环保公益性行业科研专项(201009055); 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目:数字城市环境网络建设与示范(KZCX2-YW-453)


The characteristics and influential factors of direct carbon emissions from residential energy consumption: a case study of Lijiang City, China
Author:
Affiliation:

Institute of Urban Environment,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Gradate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Institute of Urban Environment,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences,Chinese Academy of Sciences

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    现代社会中人类活动对碳排放的影响日益显著。家庭作为人类社会的基本单元,其消费活动产生的碳排放是全社会碳排放的重要组成部分。通过对丽江市农村和市区家庭生活用能的调查数据进行分析,发现农村家庭生活用能以木柴为主,沼气和电为辅;市区家庭的生活用能以电为主,其次是液化气和蜂窝煤。从碳排放构成来看,农村地区木柴消费为家庭能源碳排放的主要来源,占总碳排的83.6%;市区电力消费为家庭能源碳排放的主要来源,占总碳排的88.4%。农村地区家庭的碳排放远高于市区家庭,主要原因是木柴的碳排放因子(1.87 kg CO2/kg)远高于电能的边际排放因子(0.7134 kg CO2·kW-1·h-1)。从各影响因素与家庭主要能源消费碳排放的回归结果来看,在农村地区,家庭规模、家庭收入、教育水平均对家庭木柴消费碳排放有显著的影响,但影响方向和程度有一定的差别;在市区,年龄结构、教育水平、家庭规模、住房面积均会不同程度增加家庭电能消费碳排放。建议政府在完善"家电下乡"政策、增加农村家庭收入、加强农村居民教育等方面加大投入力度,以减少丽江市整体的家庭能耗碳排放。

    Abstract:

    Human activities have increasingly contributed to the total carbon emissions in a considerable portion in contemporary society. Energy consumption of each family, which is the basic unit of our society, is one of the most important sources of anthropic carbon emissions. Studying family consumption characteristic as well as the resulting carbon emissions pattern is of great significance for the fulfillment of the low-carbon strategy in China. By conducting a systematic family survey and panel data collection, a detailed inventory on energy-caused carbon emissions from rural and urban households in Lijiang city was exhibited. The divergences among different households, and related socioeconomic drivers were analyzed. The results showed that: (1) The main type of energy consumed by urban families was electricity, with liquid gas and coal as subsidiary, while the main type of energy consumed by rural families was firewood, supplemented by methane and electricity. In rural areas, the annual average carbon emission from firewood consumption was 4051kg per family, which accounted for 83.66% of total carbon emissions. In urban areas, the annual average carbon emission from electricity consumption was 1280kg per family, occupying 83.4% of the total. (2)The amount of family carbon emissions in rural areas was much higher than that in urban areas due to different energy consumption types, while the carbon emissions factor of firewood (1.87 kg CO2/kg) is much higher than the marginal carbon emissions coefficient of electricity (0.7134kg CO2·kW-1·h-1). (3) Household carbon emission in rural areas was significantly affected by family size, family income and education level. The enlargement of family size increased the household carbon emission by raising firewood consumption. Improvement of family income and education level promoted the use of low-carbon energy instead of firewood, which led to a decrease in carbon emission. (4) Household carbon emission in urban areas was significantly affected by age structure, education level, family size and housing area. The increase of the factors would lead to the increase of electricity consumption and the resulting carbon emission. (5) Necessary policies and regulations could be implemented to reduce family carbon emissions and included enlarging the covering area of "Home Appliances to the Countryside" policy, especially for remote rural areas, increasing family income by implement supporting policies, and raising environmental awareness of farmers by more education.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王丹寅,唐明方,任引,邓红兵.丽江市家庭能耗碳排放特征及影响因素.生态学报,2012,32(24):7716~7721

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: