2D与3D景观指数测定山区植被景观格局变化对比分析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(40901097);云南省教育厅基金项目资助(09C0009)


A comparison of 2D and 3D landscape metrics for vegetation patterns change quantification in mountainous areas
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    植被和土地覆盖变化是环境变化的一个重要因素,同时也是引起景观和生态系统变化的重要原因。景观指数是定量分析植被和土地覆盖变化的重要研究方法之一。以滇西北高山峡谷区为案例区,比较分析传统2D景观指数和3D景观指数进行植被变化定量测定的差异。研究主要选取了基于斑块面积和周长几个常用指数来进行比较分析。研究结果表明在斑块层次上,除了分维数指数,其他指数的三维方法计算值显著地高于二维方法计算值;在类型层次上,三维的类型面积指数、平均斑块面积指数、平均最小邻近距离指数测定的变化值显著大于二维的相应指数测定变化值,但是二维和三维平均形状指数和分维指数测定的植被斑块的平均形状变化结果没有显著差异;在景观层次,只有三维的平均斑块面积和最小邻近距离指数测定的变化结果显著高于二维的平均面积和最小邻近距离指数测定的变化结果,其它指数如形状指数、分维指数、多样性指数和均一度指数等测定出两个不同时期的植被图格局变化结果均无显著差异,主要由于这些指数是采用面积和周长的对数或者比值计算得出,从而缩小了斑块表面面积与平面面积,表面周长与平面周长之间的差异。总体而言,利用二维景观指数在进行定量分析山区植被格局变化时,往往低估了其类型面积、平均斑块面积、斑块邻近距离等指数变化量,而三维景观指数得到相对较精确的变化值。

    Abstract:

    Vegetation change is one of the most important aspects of environmental change. It also is one of the most important reasons for landscape and ecosystem change. Vegetation change can be quantified by landscape pattern indices (LPIs). The objectives of this study are to compare 3D metrics pattern analysis with 2D common metrics pattern analysis for vegetation changes quantification in mountainous study areas of northwest Yunnan Province, China. In order to achieve this objective, a set of landscape metrics were selected. The calculations of these metrics are based on patch area and perimeter. The results show that at the patch level, except for the metric of fractal dimension (FD), other metrics derived by the 3D approach are significantly larger than those derived by the 2D method. At the class level, the class area (CA) changes quantified by surface geometries are significantly larger than those derived by planimetric area. The changes in surface basic mean patch area metrics both at the class and landscape levels are significantly larger than those of the mean patch areas derived by 2D common flat metrics. However, the results show that there are no significant differences between 3D and 2D shape metrics (SI and FD) for quantifying the patch shape changes over time. Moreover, for richness and evenness metrics there are also no significant differences between the 2D and 3D methods for quantifying the landscape richness and evenness change. The reason could be due to the calculation of shape metrics based on the regression of logP on logA. This regression could reduce the differences between 2D flat area and the surface area, and between flat perimeter and surface perimeter. The calculation of diversity and evenness metrics is based on proportion of CA. The ratio of CA/TA also could reduce the differences between flat area and surface area, and between flat perimeter and surface perimeter. Generally, in steep mountains, the vegetation changes quantified by 2D common metrics can be underestimated dramatically, especially for the change of CA, MPA, and MENN.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张志明,罗亲普,王文礼,尹梅,孙振华,欧晓昆*,柳小康.2D与3D景观指数测定山区植被景观格局变化对比分析.生态学报,2010,30(21):5886~5893

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: