贺兰山马鹿冬春季生境的选择
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(30670309);国家科技支撑项目——自然保护区濒危物种保护技术研究资助项目(2008BADB0B04);宁夏回族自治区林业局自选课题资助项目(2004-01);宁夏贺兰山国家级自然保护区第二次综合科学考察专项资金资助项目


Winter and spring habitat selection of Red deer (Cervus elaphus alxaicus) in the Helan Mountains, China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    2007年12月~2008年1月和2008年4~5月,在贺兰山利用痕迹检验法和直接观察法对马鹿阿拉善亚种冬春季生境选择进行研究。通过在选定的15条沟段里进行调查,冬春季各测定了131个和181个样方的18种生态因子。结果表明,冬春季贺兰山马鹿在植被类型、优势乔木、灌木密度、灌木高度、灌木距离、坡向、坡位、海拔高度、距裸岩距离和隐蔽级10种生态因子上差异极显著(P < 0.001),其余生态因子无显著差异(P < 0.05),相对于冬季生境而言,马鹿春季更偏爱选择以油松和青海云杉为优势乔木的山地针叶林带,灌木密度大、高度高、距离近,半阴半阳坡的中坡位,海拔较高,距裸岩较近,隐蔽程度高的生境。典则判别系数显示冬春季马鹿在生境选择上存在一定程度的重叠,但春季马鹿的分布范围要比冬季更广一些,Wilk’s λ值显示冬春季马鹿的生境选择具有较高的差异性(Wilk’s λ = 0.683,x2 = 116.995,df = 13,P < 0.001)。逐步判别分析表明在区分冬春季马鹿生境方面有一系列生态因子发挥作用,依照贡献值的大小依次为:乔木密度、灌木距离、坡度、海拔高度、距水源距离、距裸岩距离和隐蔽级,由这7个变量构成的方程对冬春季马鹿生境的正确区分率达到79.9%,其中对春季的误判率为22.1%,对冬季的误判率为20.6%。

    Abstract:

    We studied habitat selection of red deer (Cervus elaphus alxaicus) during winter 2007-08 and spring 2008 in the Helan Mountains on the border between Ningxia and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Regions. We documented deer habitat through direct observation and examination of fresh sites used by red deer located on 21 transects distributed throughout the study area. Eighteen ecological factors from 131 winter sites and 181 spring sites were measured in 15 drainages in the study area. Winter and spring habitat selection by red deer differed in most ecological factors, i.e., vegetation type, dominant tree, shrub height, distance to nearest shrubs, slope, aspect, altitude, distance to bare rock, and hiding cover. Compared with winter habitat, red deer selected spring habitats with montane conifer forest dominated by Pinus tabulaeformis and Picea crassifolia, slightly higher shrub density, shrub height, and closer proximity to shrubs and slopes, gently higher altitude at half sunny and shady side, closer to bare bock, and higher hiding cover. Canonical scores indicated that winter and spring habitats selected by red deer overlapped to some extent. However, scores for spring habitat locations were distributed widely. The Wilk′s lambda exhibited a highly significant difference in winter and spring habitat selection of red deer (Wilk’s λ = 0.683, χ2 = 116.995, df = 13, P < 0.001). Discriminating variables that improved a stepwise discriminant model included (in order of importance) tree density, distance to the nearest shrubs, slope degree, altitude, distance to water resource, distance to bare rock, and hiding cover. Predicted accuracy of the model in classifying red deer habitats was 79.9%. Misclassification of spring habitats and winter habitats by red deer were 22.1% and 20.6% respectively.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

骆颖,张明明,刘振生*,李志刚,胡天华,翟昊.贺兰山马鹿冬春季生境的选择.生态学报,2009,29(5):2757~2763

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: