三种方法测定高寒草甸生态系统蒸散比较
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

Q145,Q945,Q948

基金项目:


Comparison of three methods for measurement of evapotranspiration in an alpine meadow
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    利用涡度相关技术(Eddy covariance technique)、小型蒸渗仪(Mini-lysimeter)和波文比-能量平衡法(BREB) 对2005年和2006年夏季(7~8月份)青藏高原海北高寒草甸生态系统的昼间蒸散(E)变化进行了对比观测研究。在观测期间,存在能量不闭合现象,涡度相关系统测定的湍流通量相当于有效能量的73%。3种不同方法测定的蒸散量之间具有较好的相关性,涡度相关系统与小型蒸渗仪测定的蒸散量相关系数达0.96,与波文比法的结果相关系数为0.95。然而,波文比法计算的蒸散量最大,比涡度相关系统的观测值高43%;小型蒸渗仪法的测定值次之,比涡度相关法的观测值高19%;涡度相关法测算的蒸散值最小。研究结果表明,利用涡度相关技术测定该高寒草甸生态系统的潜热通量,可能会过小评价该生态系统的蒸散量。

    Abstract:

    The daytime evapotranspiration (E) was measured using the eddy covariance (EC) technique, the mini-lysimeter method, and the Bowen ratio-energy balance (BREB) method, in an alpine meadow ecosystem on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau during the growing season of 2005 and 2006 (Jul.-Aug.). The energy imbalance with a slope of 0.73 was found in this study. Results showed a significant correlation between the E measured with the three methods, with the correlation coefficient of 0.96 between the EC technique and the mini-lysimeter method, and 0.95 between the EC technique and the BREB method. However, the value of E measured by the BREB was the largest, which was 43% higher than that by the EC; whilst the E measured with the mini-lysimeter had the medium value, which was 19% higher than that by the EC. The results suggest that the E may be underestimated using the EC in this alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

戚培同,古松,唐艳鸿,杜明远,吴力博,赵亮.三种方法测定高寒草甸生态系统蒸散比较.生态学报,2008,28(1):202~211

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: