青藏高原国家公园群生境质量评估
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

1.成都理工大学地球科学学院;2.中南林业科技大学;3.中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究(2019QZKK0401);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项(A类)(XDA20020303)


Habitat quality assessment of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau National Park GroupWenping Yang1,Huaiyong Shao 1,Jiarong huang 2,Baorong Haung 3**
Author:
Affiliation:

1.College of Earth Science,Chengdu University of Technology;2.Institute of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    本文基于In VEST模型对青藏高原国家公园群13个国家公园或国家公园建设候选区(后续均简称为国家公园)2010、2015年2020年的生境质量进行了评估,以期为未来国家公园群的建设、管理和生态保护修复工作提供支撑。结果表明:(1)青藏高原国家公园群生境质量整体较高,生境质量等级为高质量的区域占优势地位,具有很高的保护价值,其中,羌塘、三江源、若尔盖、青海湖和高黎贡山国家公园生境质量相对较高,帕米尔-昆仑山国家公园生境质量相对较低;(2)2010-2020年,帕米尔—昆仑山、三江源、若尔盖、青海湖、羌塘和高黎贡山国家公园生境质量有所改善,珠穆朗玛、雅鲁藏布大峡谷、香格里拉、祁连山、贡嘎山、冈仁波齐和大熊猫国家公园生境质量有所恶化;(3)国家公园群生境质量和重点保护野生动物物种丰富度在空间分布上存在差异性,高黎贡山、大熊猫、若尔盖、青海湖、贡嘎山、雅鲁藏布大峡谷、珠穆朗玛和香格里拉国家公园,生境质量较高的同时具有丰富的重点保护野生动物物种,三江源、祁连山、羌塘等国家公园生境质量高、重点保护野生动物物种丰富度相对较低,但分布有众多种群规模较大的特有物种,帕米尔-昆仑山国家公园生境质量和物种丰富度均相对较低;(4)对于生境质量高、物种丰富度高但生境质量呈下降趋势的雅鲁藏布江大峡谷、贡嘎山、香格里拉、珠穆朗玛等国家公园候选区,建议优先推动国家公园创建以减缓人类活动对高质量生境和重要野生动植物栖息地的破坏。

    Abstract:

    Based on In VEST model, this paper evaluates the habitat quality of 13 national parks or candidate areas for national park (hereinafter referred to as national parks) of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau National Park Group in 2010, 2015 and 2020 in order to provide support for the construction, management and ecological protection and restoration of National Park groups in the future. The results show that: (1) The overall habitat quality of national parks in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is relatively high, and the areas with high quality of habitat quality rank occupy a dominant position and have high protection value. Among them, the habitat quality in national parks ofQiangtang, Three-River-Source, Zorgai, Qinghai Lake and Gaoligong Mountains is relatively high, while that in national parks of Pamir-Kunlun Mountains is relatively poor. (2) From 2010 to 2020, the habitat quality of Pamir-Kunlun Mountains, Three-River-Source, Zorgai, Qinghai Lake, Qiangtang and Gaoligong Mountains National Park showed an upward trend, while that of Qomolangma, YarlungZangbo Grand Canyon, Shangri La, Qilian Mountains, Minya Konka, Kangrinpocheand Giant Panda National Park showed a downward trend. (3) Habitat quality of National Park groups and species richness of wildlife under key protection are different in spatial distribution. National parks such as Gaoligong Mountain, Giant Pandas, Zorgai, Qinghai Lake, Minya Konka,YarlungZangbo Grand Canyon, Qomolangma and Shangri La National Park have high habitat quality and abundant species resources. National parks such as Three-River-Source, Qilian Mountains and Qiangtang have high habitat quality and relatively low species richness. However, there are many unique species with large population size. The habitat quality and species richness of Pamir-Kunlun Mountain National Park are relatively low. (4) For the candidate areas of YarlungZangbo River Grand Canyon, Gongga Mountains, Shangri-La and Qomolangma with high habitat quality, high species richness but declining habitat quality, it is recommended that priority be given to promoting the establishment of national parks to alleviate the destruction of high-quality habitats and important wildlife habitats by human activities.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: