有机无机缓释复合肥对土壤微生物量碳、氮和群落结构的影响
作者:
作者单位:

西南大学资源环境学院,西南大学资源环境学院,西南大学资源环境学院,西南大学资源环境学院

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S14

基金项目:

科技部农业科技成果转化资金项目(2007GB2CF100266); 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项课题(2012ZX07104-003)


Effects of organic and inorganic slow-release compound fertilizers on microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen, and microbial community structure in soil
Author:
Affiliation:

College of Resources and Environment,Southwest University,Chongqing,College of Resources and Environment,Southwest University,Chongqing,College of Resources and Environment,Southwest University,Chongqing,College of Resources and Environment,Southwest University,Chongqing

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    研究缓释复合肥不同用量对土壤微生物量碳、氮和群落结构多样性的影响,在农业生产上广泛应用缓释复合肥有着重要意义。试验采用室内长期恒温培养和磷脂脂肪酸法,以化肥和普通复合肥适量施用养分量为对比,研究缓释复合肥适量、高量和超高量施肥水平对土壤微生物PLFA含量的影响规律。结果表明,SRF1、SRF2、SRF3(缓释复合肥适量、高量和超高量)较CK(不施肥)和CF1(化肥适量)显著增加土壤微生物量碳,且较CK、CF1和CCF1(普通复合肥适量)显著增加土壤微生物量氮。土壤微生物量碳、氮随着缓释复合肥施肥水平的增加而增加,但没有随着施肥水平的倍量增加而倍量增加,且SRF2和SRF3无显著差异。缓释复合肥(SRF1、SRF2和SRF3)较CK、CF1和CCF1增加土壤PLFA的种类和含量,且总PLFA含量增加7.4%-26.7%、17.6%-38.7%和12.8%-33.0%,3个施肥水平以SRF2作用效果最好,总PLFA含量最高,分别较SRF1和较SRF3高16.4%和17.9%。土壤细菌、放线菌、革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌PLFA含量以SRF1和SRF2显著高于CF1和CCF1。主成分分析和聚类分析显示施肥处理分布较多PLFA的优势种群,SRF3与SRF1和SRF2的PLFA结构差别较大。综上认为,适量施肥水平以缓释复合肥较化肥和普通复合肥对土壤微生物的作用显著,其中缓释复合肥3个施肥水平以高量施肥水平作用最好。

    Abstract:

    Community structure and edaphon quantity play important roles in soil quality changes and nutrition cycling. There have been many studies on the relationships between soil microbial properties and fertilizer application. However, to our knowledge, there is no information concerning the soil microbial properties affected by organic and inorganic slow-release compound fertilizers, which are widely used in agricultural production. To reveal the influence of slow-release compound fertilizer on soil microorganisms, six treatments, consisting of soil mixed with different fertilizers, were placed in an incubator at 25℃ and 80% field capacity. These were a control (CK, without fertilization), moderate doses of chemical fertilizer (CF1), common compound fertilizer (CCF1), slow-release compound fertilizer (SRF1), and slow-release compound fertilizer at high and excessive levels (SRF2 and SRF3, respectively), and each treatment was repeated three times. Soil microbial properties, such as contents and compositions of microbial PLFA (Phospholipid fatty acid), the microbial community, the ratios of different microorganisms etc. were investigated, and principal components analysis and cluster analysis of soil microbes were also undertaken.The results showed that the soil microbial properties were significantly improved by slow-release compound fertilizers. The soil microbial biomass carbon in the SRF1, SRF2, and SRF3 treatments increased significantly compared to CK and CF1, and SRF1, SRF2, and SRF3 soil microbial biomass nitrogen increased significantly compared to CK, CF1 and CCF1. The soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen levels increased as the application rate of the slow-release compound fertilizer rose, but it was not in a direct ratio, and there were significant differences between SRF1 and SRF2. Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) content was highest in SRF2, and the total PLFA content in SRF1, SRF2 and SRF3 increased by 7.4%-26.7% more than in CK, 17.6%-38.7% more than in CF1, and 12.8%-33.0% more than in CCF1. There were 18 microbial types marked by phospholipid fatty acid in SRF2, one type more than in SRF1, two types more than in CF1 and SRF3, and three types more than in CK and CCF1. At the same time, SRF2 was the best treatment among the three slow-release compound fertilizer levels, and the SRF2 total PLFA content was 16.4% more than SRF1 and 17.9% more than SRF3. The PLFA quantities for soil bacteria, actinomycetes, gram positive bacteria, and gram negative bacteria were significantly higher in SRF1 and SRF2 than in CF1 and CCF1. The ratios of soil microbial communities could be a sensitive indicator for predicting changes in soil ecosystems, and the slow-release compound fertilizer treatments were able to improve the stability of the ecosystem. Principal components analysis and cluster analysis showed that many of the dominant PLFAs were found in the fertilizer treatments, and SRF3 was different from SRF1 and SRF2 according to their distributions in the principal components analysis. In summary, slow-release compound fertilizerssignificantly improved soil microbial community structure compared to chemical fertilizer and common compound fertilizer at an appropriate level of fertilization, and SRF2 was the best among the three levels of slow-release compound fertilizer treatments.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

王菲,袁婷,谷守宽,王正银.有机无机缓释复合肥对土壤微生物量碳、氮和群落结构的影响.生态学报,2016,36(7):2044~2051

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数: